Re: FW: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: allow ATH10K_SNOC with COMPILE_TEST

[Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>]

Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 06:02:48PM +0530, Govind Singh wrote:
>> On 2018-06-12 17:45, Govind Singh wrote:
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: ath10k <ath10k-bounces@lists.infradead.org> On Behalf Of Niklas
>> > Cassel
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 5:09 PM
>> > To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>; David S. Miller
>> > <davem@davemloft.net>
>> > Cc: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
>> > linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>> > ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: allow ATH10K_SNOC with COMPILE_TEST
>> > 
>> > ATH10K_SNOC builds just fine with COMPILE_TEST, so make that possible.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig | 3 ++-
>> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
>> > b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
>> > index 54ff5930126c..6572a43590a8 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/Kconfig
>> > @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ config ATH10K_USB
>> > 
>> >  config ATH10K_SNOC
>> >  	tristate "Qualcomm ath10k SNOC support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>> > -	depends on ATH10K && ARCH_QCOM
>> > +	depends on ATH10K
>> > +	depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
>> >  	---help---
>> >  	  This module adds support for integrated WCN3990 chip connected
>> >  	  to system NOC(SNOC). Currently work in progress and will not
>> 
>> Thanks Niklas for enabling COMPILE_TEST. With QMI set of
>> changes(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10448183/), we need to enable
>> COMPILE_TEST for
>> QCOM_SCM/QMI_HELPERS which seems broken today. Are you planning to fix the
>> same.
>
>
> Argh..
>
> qcom_scm seems fine, it is just missing a single definition in the
> #else clause of include/linux/qcom_scm.h.
>
> +++ b/include/linux/qcom_scm.h
> @@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ static inline int qcom_scm_pas_mem_setup(u32 peripheral, phys_addr_t addr,                                     
>  static inline int
>  qcom_scm_pas_auth_and_reset(u32 peripheral) { return -ENODEV; }
>  static inline int qcom_scm_pas_shutdown(u32 peripheral) { return -ENODEV; }                                                      
> +static inline int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,                                                       
> +                                     unsigned int *src,
> +                                     struct qcom_scm_vmperm *newvm,                                                              
> +                                     int dest_cnt) { return -ENODEV; }                                                           
>  static inline void qcom_scm_cpu_power_down(u32 flags) {}
>  static inline u32 qcom_scm_get_version(void) { return 0; }
>
>
>
> include/linux/soc/qcom/qmi.h on the other hand doesn't have any
> dummy defintions at all.
> I think that it makes sense to be able to compile test
> the QMI helpers also on other archs..
>
> Bjorn, any opinion?

Please don't drop ath10k list, adding it back.

-- 
Kalle Valo