From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265188AbTLFPKb (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:10:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265191AbTLFPKa (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:10:30 -0500 Received: from sp-260-1.net4.netcentrix.net ([4.21.254.118]:6629 "EHLO asmodeus.mcnaught.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265188AbTLFPKa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:10:30 -0500 To: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Rootkit queston References: <874qwehxf1.wl@drakkar.ibe.miee.ru> From: Doug McNaught Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 10:10:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: ( =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd's_message_of?= "Sat, 06 Dec 2003 16:01:20 +0100") Message-ID: <87ad66ugmd.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/20.7 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård) writes: > Suppose you found a bug in a web server that would make the server > append arbitrary data to existing files. Adding that line to > inetd.conf would be one way to use that bug to gain full control over > the machine. But the inetd.conf line itself isn't an "attack"; it's a backdoor put in after an attack is successful. Just terminology... :) -Doug