From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75599ECE58F for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4149420873 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.b="YhiIDr4g" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727681AbfJOJ7k (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:59:40 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:39937 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727018AbfJOJ7j (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:59:39 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46srWC5sZyz9sPF; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:59:35 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1571133576; bh=g7FNvEmUMKUBTSEs/cnh7zM1HyCNiU5+T2IblHoqAb0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=YhiIDr4gz6XDbMGr15Sc7t/zYDWa3ckmLK2XTtTmSgqqrNXBz3WCh1sI7ugcw7No9 9z/qYOLr8MUPtAKaVi6QmsvCB+7syHLOtLjJMiLHvuVXrmdhQ4kfc4R/hxhAzoqcWc DXrJZVow2QCc1+8qU0s/wthBbQykITP7zxw6ctjJwt4d++rY+SWJGL4nH5dUvX9Ymv IlRkxldrLGRye660X7Ik8GGe+BCEWbA2Gw87Q+Xg1ydHXlKtoT1RN/BHCo0LAQcUO9 0pu9XfAzqas4SdhbSR34cVXh+P3Yl/xhSjCSnzZYeqor9s72u1idfYI6KnZza8CMRy b2RE/asCPE4Nw== From: Michael Ellerman To: Mimi Zohar , Nayna Jain , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Ard Biesheuvel , Jeremy Kerr , Matthew Garret , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Claudio Carvalho , George Wilson , Elaine Palmer , Eric Ricther , Oliver O'Halloran Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] powerpc: add support to initialize ima policy rules In-Reply-To: <1570799579.5250.72.camel@linux.ibm.com> References: <1570497267-13672-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> <1570497267-13672-3-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> <1570799579.5250.72.camel@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:59:34 +1100 Message-ID: <87bluiuy61.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mimi Zohar writes: > On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 21:14 -0400, Nayna Jain wrote: ... >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> index b4a221886fcf..deb19ec6ba3d 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig >> @@ -938,6 +938,8 @@ config PPC_SECURE_BOOT >> prompt "Enable secure boot support" >> bool >> depends on PPC_POWERNV >> + depends on IMA >> + depends on IMA_ARCH_POLICY > > As IMA_ARCH_POLICY is dependent on IMA, I don't see a need for > depending on both IMA and IMA_ARCH_POLICY. I agree. And what we actually depend on is the arch part, so it should depend on just IMA_ARCH_POLICY. cheers