From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB95C43441 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7806A2086E for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:17:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7806A2086E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xmission.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726093AbeJKFlk convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:41:40 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:52913 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725969AbeJKFlk (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 01:41:40 -0400 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1gAMnJ-0005cT-A4; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:17:29 -0600 Received: from 67-3-154-154.omah.qwest.net ([67.3.154.154] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1gAMn3-0005i3-T8; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:17:29 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: James Bottomley Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel References: <1539202053.12644.8.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1539202115.12644.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:17:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1539202115.12644.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (James Bottomley's message of "Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:08:35 -0700") Message-ID: <87bm81v44f.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-XM-SPF: eid=1gAMn3-0005i3-T8;;;mid=<87bm81v44f.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.3.154.154;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19gusAeMyDEqXUtoAgIC99cOD8B1zDLRUo= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.3.154.154 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org James Bottomley writes: > The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing > private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since > the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch > process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by > the project to correct this ambiguity. Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" > > Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.") > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > Acked-by: Shuah Khan > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck > Reviewed-by: Alan Cox > Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley > --- > Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: > * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks > * Public or private harassment > * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic > - address, without explicit permission > + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission > * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a > professional setting