From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BFAC433FE for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395AC60E05 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230394AbhJLQax (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:30:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:42866 "EHLO mail-pl1-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229495AbhJLQaw (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:30:52 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id l6so13853069plh.9; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:28:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lqr0Xjwo4bt3FrFTL/PXm4WKYr4cNF7lZlXpOFURPfQ=; b=SjJGQP6U6oLLtzpWYa39+eIyV/ufxLuk60KmSL3tNqrNmmJ8T7IGinTHuTa9Gybf2h K2MWmvZRv50yyRntsu8PJ4uJtcHMfuw+m9YSTaqd9071skdn+jPT4IA+c6A5pEV+/6xw cZPk3gsrNMMuAJT5stit8AztCFtMAmr/5mG7cLci89wkkVJFVD4XBVnXKhsOEn7hdhjz ZmeBTrlu/wcXxE7dyhzTp9NLZIIHi4VAuA7z2UFqgJhLrt4EY2zfFXGX5j0wagArblyc nxaJavVfir0069ZZK74MXqKbAJ2gG5IYDByuwYWiauX7wUpfU4rLQygjXRqkoYLHFarI KvAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530QpWi4BwCYFrdZ2pxDv3AogGqO/Cx1ZgXnxpg0qpmFjgnaCFAy fhJlelhuvP/jaZGvAMCVL61NH+/QoeQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIvz2dXTPPZrJJPf3E236of698Im62a+c0zIOAN9z2BtB6E2tsUs4RK05DMhyFmQX5M4kIjA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b391:: with SMTP id e17mr7186659pjr.137.1634056129580; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bvanassche-linux.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:211:201:8c1a:acb2:4eff:5d13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j6sm6268139pfb.175.2021.10.12.09.28.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: print write through due to no caching mode page as warning To: Martin Kepplinger , jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com Cc: dgilbert@interlog.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210122083000.32598-1-martin.kepplinger@puri.sm> <2d3b0e8f422b7ff08a5c4ce804a1884eaf9b5d60.camel@puri.sm> From: Bart Van Assche Message-ID: <87cad616-2075-b52e-cb8c-2f7180bbb1ee@acm.org> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:28:47 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2d3b0e8f422b7ff08a5c4ce804a1884eaf9b5d60.camel@puri.sm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/12/21 8:18 AM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > does this "consmetic" change have any chance of being acceptible? At > least it'd be nice if messages sent as error are real errors that needs > fixing. Hi Martin, It seems like I overlooked that patch. Since this patch was posted ten months ago, it is likely that it has disappeared from the mailboxes of the people who are interested in this patch. Please repost this patch. Thanks, Bart.