linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Jacob Jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
	Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86/mmu: Allocate/free PASID
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 01:44:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d07spk8a.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200427221825.GF242333@romley-ivt3.sc.intel.com>

Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 04:55:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> writes:
>> > + +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM +	int pasid;
>> 
>> int? It's a value which gets programmed into the MSR along with the valid 
>> bit (bit 31) set.
>
> The pasid is defined as "int" in struct intel_svm and in 
> intel_svm_bind_mm() and intel_svm_unbind_mm(). So the pasid defined in this 
> patch follows the same type defined in those places.

Which are wrong to begin with.

>> ioasid_alloc() uses ioasid_t which is
>> 
>> typedef unsigned int ioasid_t;
>> 
>> Can we please have consistent types and behaviour all over the place?
>
> Should I just define "pasid", "pasid_max", "flags" as "unsigned int" for
> the new functions/code?
>
> Or should I also change their types to "unsigned int" in the original
> svm code (struct intel_svm, ...bind_mm(), etc)? I'm afraid that will be
> a lot of changes and should be in a separate preparation patch.

Yes, please. The existance of non-sensical code is not an excuse to
proliferate it.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-27 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-30 19:33 [PATCH 0/7] x86: tag application address space for devices Fenghua Yu
2020-03-30 19:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] docs: x86: Add a documentation for ENQCMD Fenghua Yu
2020-04-26 11:02   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-27 20:13     ` Fenghua Yu
2020-03-30 19:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate ENQCMD and ENQCMDS instructions Fenghua Yu
2020-04-26 11:06   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-27 20:17     ` Fenghua Yu
2020-03-30 19:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86/fpu/xstate: Add supervisor PASID state for ENQCMD feature Fenghua Yu
2020-04-26 11:17   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-27 20:33     ` Fenghua Yu
2020-03-30 19:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86/msr-index: Define IA32_PASID MSR Fenghua Yu
2020-04-26 11:22   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-27 20:50     ` Fenghua Yu
2020-03-30 19:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/mmu: Allocate/free PASID Fenghua Yu
2020-04-26 14:55   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-27 22:18     ` Fenghua Yu
2020-04-27 23:44       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-04-28 18:21     ` Jacob Pan (Jun)
2020-04-28 18:54       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-28 19:07         ` Luck, Tony
2020-04-28 20:42           ` Jacob Pan (Jun)
2020-04-28 20:59             ` Luck, Tony
2020-04-28 22:13               ` Jacob Pan (Jun)
2020-04-28 22:32                 ` Luck, Tony
2020-04-28 20:40         ` Jacob Pan (Jun)
2020-04-28 20:57     ` Fenghua Yu
2020-03-30 19:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/traps: Fix up invalid PASID Fenghua Yu
2020-04-26 15:25   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-27 20:11     ` Fenghua Yu
2020-04-28  0:13       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-27 22:46     ` Raj, Ashok
2020-04-27 23:08       ` Luck, Tony
2020-04-28  0:20         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-28  0:54       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-04-28  1:08         ` Raj, Ashok
2020-03-30 19:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86/process: Clear PASID state for a newly forked/cloned thread Fenghua Yu
2020-04-22 20:41 ` [PATCH 0/7] x86: tag application address space for devices Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d07spk8a.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).