From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>, "Ghorai\,
Sukumar" <sukumar.ghorai@intel.com>, "Amara\,
Madhusudanarao" <madhusudanarao.amara@intel.com>, "Nandamuri\,
Srikanth" <srikanth.nandamuri@intel.com>
Subject: Re: MSI interrupt for xhci still lost on 5.6-rc6 after cpu hotplug
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:52:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d0974akk.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <806c51fa-992b-33ac-61a9-00a606f82edb@linux.intel.com>
Mathias,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> writes:
> I can reproduce the lost MSI interrupt issue on 5.6-rc6 which includes
> the "Plug non-maskable MSI affinity race" patch.
>
> I can see this on a couple platforms, I'm running a script that first generates
> a lot of usb traffic, and then in a busyloop sets irq affinity and turns off
> and on cpus:
>
> for i in 1 3 5 7; do
> echo "1" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/online
> done
> echo "A" > "/proc/irq/*/smp_affinity"
> echo "A" > "/proc/irq/*/smp_affinity"
> echo "F" > "/proc/irq/*/smp_affinity"
> for i in 1 3 5 7; do
> echo "0" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/online
> done
> trace snippet:
> <idle>-0 [001] d.h. 129.676900: xhci_irq: xhci irq
> <idle>-0 [001] d.h. 129.677507: xhci_irq: xhci irq
> <idle>-0 [001] d.h. 129.677556: xhci_irq: xhci irq
> <idle>-0 [001] d.h. 129.677647: xhci_irq: xhci irq
> <...>-14 [001] d..1 129.679802: msi_set_affinity: direct update msi 122, vector 33 -> 33, apicid: 2 -> 6
Looks like a regular affinity setting in interrupt context, but I can't
make sense of the time stamps
> <idle>-0 [003] d.h. 129.682639: xhci_irq: xhci irq
> <idle>-0 [003] d.h. 129.702380: xhci_irq: xhci irq
> <idle>-0 [003] d.h. 129.702493: xhci_irq: xhci irq
> migration/3-24 [003] d..1 129.703150: msi_set_affinity: direct update msi 122, vector 33 -> 33, apicid: 6 -> 0
So this is a CPU offline operation and after that irq 122 is silent, right?
> kworker/0:0-5 [000] d.h. 131.328790: msi_set_affinity: direct update msi 121, vector 34 -> 34, apicid: 0 -> 0
> kworker/0:0-5 [000] d.h. 133.312704: msi_set_affinity: direct update msi 121, vector 34 -> 34, apicid: 0 -> 0
> kworker/0:0-5 [000] d.h. 135.360786: msi_set_affinity: direct update msi 121, vector 34 -> 34, apicid: 0 -> 0
> <idle>-0 [000] d.h. 137.344694: msi_set_affinity: direct update msi 121, vector 34 -> 34, apicid: 0 -> 0
> kworker/0:0-5 [000] d.h. 139.128679: msi_set_affinity: direct update msi 121, vector 34 -> 34, apicid: 0 -> 0
> kworker/0:0-5 [000] d.h. 141.312686: msi_set_affinity: direct update msi 121, vector 34 -> 34, apicid: 0 -> 0
> kworker/0:0-5 [000] d.h. 143.360703: msi_set_affinity: direct update msi 121, vector 34 -> 34, apicid: 0 -> 0
> kworker/0:0-5 [000] d.h. 145.344791: msi_set_affinity: direct update msi 121, vector 34 -> 34, apicid: 0 -> 0
That kworker context looks fishy. Can you please enable stacktraces in
the tracer so I can see the call chains leading to this? OTOH that's irq
121 not 122. Anyway moar information is always useful.
And please add the patch below.
Thanks,
tglx
8<---------------
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ u64 arch_irq_stat(void)
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "IRQ failed to wake up RCU");
desc = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
+ trace_printk("vector: %u desc %lx\n", vector, (unsigned long) desc);
if (likely(!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc))) {
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
handle_irq(desc, regs);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-20 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-18 19:25 MSI interrupt for xhci still lost on 5.6-rc6 after cpu hotplug Mathias Nyman
2020-03-19 20:24 ` Evan Green
2020-03-20 8:07 ` Mathias Nyman
2020-03-20 9:52 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-03-23 9:42 ` Mathias Nyman
2020-03-23 14:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-23 20:32 ` Mathias Nyman
2020-03-24 0:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 16:17 ` Evan Green
2020-03-24 19:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-01 18:43 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-05-05 19:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-05 20:16 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-05-05 21:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-07 12:18 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-05-07 12:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-07 17:57 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-05-07 19:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25 17:12 ` Mathias Nyman
[not found] <20200508005528.GB61703@otc-nc-03>
2020-05-08 11:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-08 16:09 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-05-08 16:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-11 19:03 ` Raj, Ashok
2020-05-11 20:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d0974akk.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madhusudanarao.amara@intel.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=srikanth.nandamuri@intel.com \
--cc=sukumar.ghorai@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).