From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752403AbaDYH6a (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 03:58:30 -0400 Received: from LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.151]:55536 "EHLO lgemrelse7q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752105AbaDYH61 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 03:58:27 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.220.181 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@gmail.com From: Namhyung Kim To: Don Zickus Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , Namhyung Kim , LKML , David Ahern , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 00/17] perf report: Add -F option for specifying output fields (v4) References: <1397617554-26319-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <20140422211647.GO8488@redhat.com> <87lhuwr2pk.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <20140423125828.GL5328@redhat.com> <1398346899.1681.18.camel@leonhard> <20140424210015.GJ8488@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:58:25 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20140424210015.GJ8488@redhat.com> (Don Zickus's message of "Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:00:15 -0400") Message-ID: <87d2g5rgbi.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Don, On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:00:15 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:41:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> Hmm.. it seems that it's exactly sorted by the data symbol addresses, so >> I don't see any problem here. What did you expect? If you want to see >> those symbol_daddr,pid pair to be sorted by overhead, you can use the >> one of -F or -s option only. > > Good question. I guess I was hoping to see things sorted by overhead, but > as you said removing all the -F options gives me that. I have been > distracted with other fires this week, I lost focus at what I was trying > to accomplish. > > Let me figure that out again and try to come up with a more clear email > explaining what I was looking for (for myself at least :-) ). > > Sorry for the distraction. No need to sorry and thank you for testing and feedbacks :) Thanks, Namhyung