From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262400AbVDGJZH (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:25:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262402AbVDGJZH (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:25:07 -0400 Received: from javad.ru ([62.105.138.7]:54990 "EHLO TopconRD.RU") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262400AbVDGJZD (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:25:03 -0400 To: David Woodhouse Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Kernel SCM saga.. References: <1112858331.6924.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-attribution: osv From: Sergei Organov Date: 07 Apr 2005 13:24:52 +0400 In-Reply-To: <1112858331.6924.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <87d5t73pnf.fsf@osv.topcon.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Woodhouse writes: > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 08:42 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > PS. Don't bother telling me about subversion. If you must, start reading > > up on "monotone". That seems to be the most viable alternative, but don't > > pester the developers so much that they don't get any work done. They are > > already aware of my problems ;) > > One feature I'd want to see in a replacement version control system is > the ability to _re-order_ patches, and to cherry-pick patches from my > tree to be sent onwards. The lack of that capability is the main reason > I always hated BitKeeper. darcs?