From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262699AbVAJVfQ@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262699AbVAJVfQ (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:35:16 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262646AbVAJVel
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:34:41 -0500
Received: from mail.enyo.de ([212.9.189.167]:63408 "EHLO mail.enyo.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262686AbVAJVby (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:31:54 -0500
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Steve Bergman <steve@rueb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Proper procedure for reporting possible security vulnerabilities?
References: <41E2B181.3060009@rueb.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:31:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <41E2B181.3060009@rueb.com> (Steve Bergman's message of "Mon, 10
	Jan 2005 10:46:57 -0600")
Message-ID: <87d5wdhsxo.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

* Steve Bergman:

> So what is the preferred procedure and is it documented somewhere?  

Contact your vendor.  You are using vendor kernels, are you? 8-)