From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CC3C433EF for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242329AbiC3IWA (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 04:22:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54852 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230199AbiC3IVz (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2022 04:21:55 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5840530F57; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F7BB60B65; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFBBAC340EC; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:19:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1648628401; bh=jlt7IgYw10SWGER4k+S1mS11PUUsamc2YkuHy9CpYeE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=HK3te1n3fuyCH5JiyLIu9Z+Uc8u0ZqR5YTqkKOp1zygqVqIQ7IeNSMErumJj5rcAY pKwXiselA6marSTubH9Yge1KM10FlS3d1qkMdzy8lsUGoyCAdZUgQxqPAhT55k48yE BDHqHCwB5lmTa5JEAMWZcGV0W2X+cQsE9mUOcY3nZH2RyUeTS93UPj1I+az6XQrzOw phsw35nsIRHAk1xNKzKt7lRZyL0qiH/iA8AMhKlCRfGFewaFVF/BMYy0H1N9Ajop2N Ie8dEXTnUhkn9QOYjLlIpSpkm9avoj3BMyPBJ8xiQZVQXaPk9fMtWt2QCQD1PScn+i 8D90loBcAPSgQ== From: Kalle Valo To: Jeff Johnson Cc: Benjamin =?utf-8?Q?St=C3=BCrz?= , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/22 v2] wcn36xx: Improve readability of wcn36xx_caps_name References: <20220326165909.506926-1-benni@stuerz.xyz> <20220326165909.506926-19-benni@stuerz.xyz> <720e4d68-683a-f729-f452-4a9e52a3c6fa@stuerz.xyz> <87y20rx6mx.fsf@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 11:19:53 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87y20rx6mx.fsf@kernel.org> (Kalle Valo's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:05:10 +0300") Message-ID: <87ee2jx36e.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kalle Valo writes: > Jeff Johnson writes: > >> (apologies for top-posting) >> When you submit new patches you should not do so as a reply, but >> instead as a new thread with a new version number. >> >> And since multiple folks have suggested that you submit on a >> per-subsystem basis I suggest that you re-send this as a singleton >> just to wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org and linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org >> along with the associated maintainers. >> >> So I believe [PATCH v3] wcn36xx:... would be the correct subject, but >> I'm sure Kalle will let us know otherwise > > You are correct. Also I strongly recommend using git send-email instead > of Mozilla. Patch handling is automated using patchwork and git, so > submitting patches manually is error prone. Yeah, our patchwork didn't even detect this patch. But v3 is visible and is on my queue: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20220328212912.283393-1-benni@stuerz.xyz/ -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches