From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@vmware.com>,
VMware Inc <pv-drivers@vmware.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Peter H Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 03/11] x86/cpufeatures: Add TDX Guest CPU feature
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 22:44:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ee8o8xje.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211009053747.1694419-4-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Oct 08 2021 at 22:37, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> +
> +bool is_tdx_guest(void)
> +{
> + static int tdx_guest = -1;
> + u32 eax, sig[3];
> +
> + if (tdx_guest >= 0)
> + goto done;
> +
> + if (cpuid_eax(0) < TDX_CPUID_LEAF_ID) {
> + tdx_guest = 0;
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> + cpuid_count(TDX_CPUID_LEAF_ID, 0, &eax, &sig[0], &sig[2], &sig[1]);
> +
> + tdx_guest = !memcmp("IntelTDX ", sig, 12);
> +
> +done:
> + return !!tdx_guest;
> +}
No. This is tasteless garbage, really.
tdx_early_init() is invoked from x86_64_start_kernel() very early in the
boot process __before__ is_tdx_guest() is invoked.
So why on earth is it requried to keep those conditionals and cpuid()
muck around after init?
> +void __init tdx_early_init(void)
> +{
> + if (!is_tdx_guest())
> + return;
> +
> + setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST);
> +
> + pr_info("Guest initialized\n");
> +}
What's wrong with:
static bool tdx_guest_detected __ro_after_init;
void __init tdx_early_init(void)
{
u32 eax, sig[3];
if (cpuid_eax(0) < TDX_CPUID_LEAF_ID)
return;
cpuid_count(TDX_CPUID_LEAF_ID, 0, &eax, &sig[0], &sig[2], &sig[1]);
if (memcmp("IntelTDX ", sig, 12))
return;
tdx_guest_detected = true;
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST);
pr_info("Guest initialized\n");
}
bool is_tdx_guest(void)
{
return tdx_guest_detected;
}
That's simple and obvious and discards all the detection gunk completely
after init and uses the proper data type, right?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-09 5:37 [PATCH v10 00/11] Add TDX Guest Support (Initial support) Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-09 5:37 ` [PATCH v10 01/11] x86/paravirt: Move halt paravirt calls under CONFIG_PARAVIRT Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-15 16:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-10-09 5:37 ` [PATCH v10 02/11] x86/tdx: Introduce INTEL_TDX_GUEST config option Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-11 18:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-11 18:38 ` Andi Kleen
2021-10-11 18:47 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-09 5:37 ` [PATCH v10 03/11] x86/cpufeatures: Add TDX Guest CPU feature Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-13 8:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-13 13:32 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-13 19:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-13 23:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-14 0:25 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-14 7:57 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <1a6220a5-3abd-dea1-4b2f-2acade311236@linux.intel.com>
2021-10-18 21:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-18 22:04 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-13 20:44 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-10-13 21:05 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-13 21:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-13 21:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-13 21:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-13 21:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-13 22:28 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-13 23:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-14 17:28 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-09 5:37 ` [PATCH v10 04/11] x86/tdx: Add TDX support to intel_cc_platform_has() Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-13 15:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-14 7:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-14 17:31 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-09 5:37 ` [PATCH v10 05/11] x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14 7:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-15 0:19 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-09 5:37 ` [PATCH v10 06/11] x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14 8:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-17 2:45 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-17 3:18 ` Dave Hansen
2021-10-17 3:49 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-09 5:37 ` [PATCH v10 07/11] x86/tdx: Add HLT " Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-15 1:33 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-15 15:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-10-09 5:37 ` [PATCH v10 08/11] x86/tdx: Wire up KVM hypercalls Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14 10:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-15 3:03 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2021-10-09 5:37 ` [PATCH v10 09/11] x86/tdx: Add MSR support for TDX guest Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-09 5:37 ` [PATCH v10 10/11] x86/tdx: Don't write CSTAR MSR on Intel Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14 10:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-14 13:47 ` Andi Kleen
2021-10-14 14:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-09 5:37 ` [PATCH v10 11/11] x86/tdx: Handle CPUID via #VE Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-14 12:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-14 13:25 ` Dave Hansen
2021-10-09 7:38 ` [PATCH v10 00/11] Add TDX Guest Support (Initial support) Borislav Petkov
2021-10-09 20:56 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-10-11 13:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-11 16:33 ` Dave Hansen
2021-10-11 16:48 ` Dave Hansen
2021-10-11 17:04 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ee8o8xje.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=knsathya@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sdeep@vmware.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).