From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419DFC55179 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE23922263 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="U2LVGOju" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2436485AbgJ0KXQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 06:23:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:42007 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2410469AbgJ0KXP (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 06:23:15 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id j7so1219329wrt.9; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:23:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B//Sw2wJ0hqD7Gjr+kfAvqiPXu+g6LMWNc+2dvqZKIA=; b=U2LVGOjuEcsuTaQ7PTIcv/VGNK7UzLj5gvyajdmn/J8FGZPsqYgUblOpjDzP7cenol sxi2McX05b+mBho+dssdYLyRMapbDpvfSfXzHfL9SgAehzDiXtEwEoj4RWmGlIC3hjIS Hf4KzrOERlUwhlGwNFYXQ1Sxll3QFB8dF4l0Qh61+G8nhbas5KaVf5u62VWs3QeR0kiy D7JmrX4IM0t4b5hSvYxVvy0LwskKa+rmffYjgh9UMqEnG8nFciT6cPRcymmKtsYBRMy8 MRcXNNRLDS4kQgPjcPkE//GrbUDAKxSeTjzDiFuMlC+i7nGn8yJ4XrNMxh+mfRa2frCx xwqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B//Sw2wJ0hqD7Gjr+kfAvqiPXu+g6LMWNc+2dvqZKIA=; b=HxR+3xYXSmKAVs95BwpwNS92gJ0bGafnZNMOZdnI7hnZxHPhI2XSrSAD50MJbAbsPv KaK4MDEafMlJDQ1DYD9fAYu8KULcuRuV6f1P642PEfAvufcLsorzhha39X65GA/xPSLa g6krl3VgsW7IHisAMBmeJtiQSnEUumUZyG486V19k2WgZcIML4ZV5jPoHn366MDyJDYv qX5JOb166KtTOoGCad0zPNVyaqOCq+T6bIojlxtemdXsnGZ9GoxX2Q13eSjQwTUPxmkL F4EpJuYudSmdius7nrr6MgorU3S8OkQlYSjGX36AwWOK9L2rqa1r/YPepggHzAy9GQFo mLuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316AiyIghUm44QWaUaiy/Rt89IrNQzNSNJibfSFXxtZbDTLyDDy EhipZuUKBM2W3ImL89JHT5l3DYqr6n0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvcuK2CIHkQV/DwWjteTFGMtPQLGAwYCGeX4Ipo1xxA2jrDeD0BwPs11em3axTqMHkiTbdFQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fd09:: with SMTP id e9mr1988097wrr.241.1603794193189; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.143] ([170.253.60.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x21sm1338343wmi.3.2020.10.27.03.23.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] system_data_types.7: Add 'off_t' To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20201005221247.13065-1-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> From: Alejandro Colomar Message-ID: <87faeeeb-f2e0-7f1e-5692-78b43242f20b@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:23:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Michael, On 2020-10-07 08:53, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > On 10/6/20 12:12 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar > > Hi Alex, > > Thanks, patch applied. And I trimmed the "See also" a little. > I'd hold off on documenting loff_t and off64_t for the > moment. As you note in another mail, the *lseek* man page > situation is a bit of a mess. I'm not yet sure what to do. I saw a TODO in the page about loff_t. Just wanted to ping you in case you forgot about it (I did). Thanks, Alex