linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Neo Jou <neojou@gmail.com>,
	Hans Ulli Kroll <linux@ulli-kroll.de>,
	Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>,
	Yan-Hsuan Chuang <tony0620emma@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] RTW88: Add support for USB variants
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 12:25:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fskrv0cm.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220518082318.3898514-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> (Sascha Hauer's message of "Wed, 18 May 2022 10:23:08 +0200")

Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> writes:

> Another problem to address is that the driver uses
> ieee80211_iterate_stations_atomic() and
> ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces_atomic() and does register accesses
> in the iterator. This doesn't work with USB, so iteration is done in two
> steps now: The ieee80211_iterate_*_atomic() functions are only used to
> collect the stations/interfaces on a list which is then iterated over
> non-atomically in the second step. The implementation for this is
> basically the one suggested by Ping-Ke here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/423f474e15c948eda4db5bc9a50fd391@realtek.com/

Isn't this racy? What guarantees that vifs are not deleted after
ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces_atomic() call?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-30  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-18  8:23 [PATCH 00/10] RTW88: Add support for USB variants Sascha Hauer
2022-05-18  8:23 ` [PATCH 01/10] rtw88: Call rtw_fw_beacon_filter_config() with rtwdev->mutex held Sascha Hauer
2022-05-18  8:23 ` [PATCH 02/10] rtw88: Drop rf_lock Sascha Hauer
2022-05-20  3:49   ` Pkshih
2022-05-20  6:54     ` s.hauer
2022-05-18  8:23 ` [PATCH 03/10] rtw88: Drop h2c.lock Sascha Hauer
2022-05-18  8:23 ` [PATCH 04/10] rtw88: Drop coex mutex Sascha Hauer
2022-05-18  8:23 ` [PATCH 05/10] rtw88: Do not access registers while atomic Sascha Hauer
2022-05-20  6:06   ` Pkshih
2022-05-20  7:07     ` s.hauer
2022-05-20 17:32   ` Larry Finger
2022-05-18  8:23 ` [PATCH 06/10] rtw88: Add common USB chip support Sascha Hauer
2022-05-18  8:32   ` Sascha Hauer
2022-05-18  8:34     ` Johannes Berg
2022-05-19 13:58       ` Sascha Hauer
2022-05-20  7:39   ` Pkshih
2022-05-20  8:51     ` s.hauer
2022-05-20  9:23       ` Pkshih
2022-05-20 18:33   ` Larry Finger
2022-05-23  4:07   ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2022-05-18  8:23 ` [PATCH 07/10] rtw88: Add rtw8723du chipset support Sascha Hauer
2022-05-18 16:55   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-20  7:47   ` Pkshih
2022-05-20  8:16     ` s.hauer
2022-05-30  6:34   ` Icenowy Zheng
2022-05-18  8:23 ` [PATCH 08/10] rtw88: Add rtw8821cu " Sascha Hauer
2022-05-20  7:56   ` Pkshih
2022-05-18  8:23 ` [PATCH 09/10] rtw88: Add rtw8822bu " Sascha Hauer
2022-05-20  7:58   ` Pkshih
2022-05-23 11:56   ` Rin Cat (鈴猫)
2022-05-23 12:34     ` Sascha Hauer
2022-05-18  8:23 ` [PATCH 10/10] rtw88: Add rtw8822cu " Sascha Hauer
2022-05-20  8:03   ` Pkshih
2022-05-20  8:56     ` s.hauer
2022-05-23  4:07 ` [PATCH 00/10] RTW88: Add support for USB variants Hans Ulli Kroll
2022-05-23  6:53   ` Sascha Hauer
2022-05-23 11:39     ` Ping-Ke Shih
2022-05-24  6:54       ` s.hauer
2022-05-23 10:13   ` Sascha Hauer
2022-05-30  9:25 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2022-05-30  9:52   ` Sascha Hauer
2022-05-30 10:07     ` Kalle Valo
2022-05-30 10:16       ` Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fskrv0cm.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@ulli-kroll.de \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=neojou@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=tony0620emma@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).