linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] x86/apic: Avoid cm->allocated going negative in irq_matrix
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:19:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ft129enb.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210219113101.967508-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>

Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:

> I discovered that CPU0 offlining/onlining works only once:
>
>      # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online
>      # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online
>      # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online
>      -bash: echo: write error: No space left on device
>     
>     with the following in dmesg:
>     
>      [ ... ] CPU 0 has 4294967295 vectors, 589 available. Cannot disable CPU
>
> And the problem seems to be that irq_matrix_assign()/irq_matrix_free() calls
> for PIC_CASCADE_IR are unbalanced, making cm->allocated go negative.
>
> RFC as I didn't quite get why we're making an exception for PIC_CASCADE_IR in
> the first place. Surely it is special, but for the sake of consistency we'd
> better not treat it as such. Or maybe I just misunderstood everything.
>

If the RFC part is the only thing which scares everyone off I'm ready to
drop it and pretend that I'm confident with the change)

> Vitaly Kuznetsov (2):
>   x86/apic: Do not make an exception for PIC_CASCADE_IR when marking
>     legacy irqs in irq_matrix
>   genirq/matrix: WARN_ON_ONCE() when cm->allocated/m->total_allocated go
>     negative
>
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c |  3 +--
>  kernel/irq/matrix.c           | 11 +++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
Vitaly


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-11 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-19 11:30 [PATCH RFC 0/2] x86/apic: Avoid cm->allocated going negative in irq_matrix Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-02-19 11:31 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] x86/apic: Do not make an exception for PIC_CASCADE_IR when marking legacy irqs " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-17 20:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-17 21:18     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-17 21:40       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-17 22:52         ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-18  8:47           ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-18  8:29     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-18 10:10       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-19 11:31 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] genirq/matrix: WARN_ON_ONCE() when cm->allocated/m->total_allocated go negative Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-17 20:38   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-18  7:58     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-18 19:29       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-03-19  9:59         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-03-11 10:19 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ft129enb.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).