From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, BUG6152_INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSURD,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F42C433E0 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C5F64E6D for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231555AbhBHJih (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2021 04:38:37 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:35412 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231293AbhBHJWB (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2021 04:22:01 -0500 From: John Ogness DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1612776078; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8Jbn6Q+0ScNBjrHfL1qvjxYdd5KQZKNqxUXvPMZpt8g=; b=yp1ksBW/rImosc2bD1nooKi/cr6fJPmmD01MSwi4dkef5VnlS8Vx3AEH3wvne7n/YQEI3u 067zhnaZ9sAHVzBpyaiKmswG8fPq7PvR8agIrod406ua3jBPv+Qa6bJeLCeIUfyL0svz3/ 0XmWC1PLt83ol1vAq15umaDeqWLCbWTxMcp7rOAprItjm4KUi27laBWMG5B/QGPsHZ3X2w BdK5tp39BbvobRsBDY6Ml4UZA9vh/pETmN+lNnMchUoSuiwduUmhW/xZwaoW0xhMAkrhAK g+ul3efsSx/RkRfBF3cY1LttDhAly5kUN8CyWjGPYhWC3kVd7cr8oXs00aVzWw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1612776078; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8Jbn6Q+0ScNBjrHfL1qvjxYdd5KQZKNqxUXvPMZpt8g=; b=BZXpSeahX88Z1YlnH7g5cZTcaiNsBQOa6qwLTN8X8X0+zFgUB3PcejZ21xrrXG3pQUUgrP PGaXnydXp9riRSAA== To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "J. Avila" Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: avoid prb_first_valid_seq() where possible In-Reply-To: References: <20210205141728.18117-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de> Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 10:27:17 +0106 Message-ID: <87ft26oqya.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021-02-08, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Can we please also ask the kernel test robot to test this patch? LKP is an automated service. The problem was reported for an older commit. The new patch will not apply. I will try to contact the LKP team and see how we can get some sort of verification. @Avila: Can you also verify that this patch fixes your issue [0]? John Ogness [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210122235238.655049-1-elavila@google.com