linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] printk: store instead of processing cont parts
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 17:03:16 +0206	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ft9kx6er.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200721144220.GE44523@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>

On 2020-07-21, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That said, we have traditionally used not just "current process", but
>> also "last irq-level" as the context information, so I do think it
>> would be good to continue to do that.
>
> OK, so basically, extending printk_caller_id() so that for IRQ/NMI
> we will have more info than just "0x80000000 + raw_smp_processor_id()".

If bit31 is set, the upper 8 bits could specify what the lower 24 bits
represent. That would give some freedom for the future.

For example:

0x80 = cpu id (generic context)
0x81 = interrupt number
0x82 = cpu id (nmi context)

Or maybe ascii should be used instead?

0x80 | '\0' = cpu id (generic context)
0x80 | 'i'  = interrupt number
0x80 | 'n'  = cpu id (nmi context)

Just an idea.

John Ogness

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-21 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-17 23:48 [PATCH 0/4] printk: reimplement LOG_CONT handling John Ogness
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records John Ogness
2020-07-20 14:49   ` John Ogness
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] printk: store instead of processing cont parts John Ogness
2020-07-19 14:35   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-19 18:27     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-20  1:50       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-20 18:30         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-21  3:53           ` Joe Perches
2020-07-21 14:42           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-21 14:57             ` John Ogness [this message]
2020-07-29  2:03               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-21 15:40             ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-28  2:22               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] printk: process cont records during reading John Ogness
2020-07-17 23:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] ipconfig: cleanup printk usage John Ogness
2020-07-18  0:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] printk: reimplement LOG_CONT handling Linus Torvalds
2020-07-18 14:42   ` John Ogness
2020-07-18 17:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-08-11 16:05     ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-12 16:39       ` POC: Alternative solution: " Petr Mladek
2020-08-13  0:24         ` John Ogness
2020-08-13  5:18           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-13  7:44             ` John Ogness
2020-08-13  8:41               ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-13 10:29                 ` John Ogness
2020-08-13 11:30                   ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-14  3:34                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-14  8:16                     ` John Ogness
2020-08-14  9:12                       ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-13 11:54                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-14  9:04                   ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-14 22:46                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-08-14 23:52                     ` Joe Perches
2020-08-15  2:33                       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-08-15  3:08                         ` Joe Perches
2020-08-15  9:25                       ` David Laight
2020-08-15  5:41                     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-08-13  7:51             ` Petr Mladek
2020-08-13  7:31           ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ft9kx6er.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
    --to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).