From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA86C54EED for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233944AbjAXQV6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:21:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53556 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231544AbjAXQV4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:21:56 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E7364A1EB; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 08:21:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:73::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4B09FFC; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:21:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net C4B09FFC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1674577313; bh=e9Ms9NIy69DBSpc92O0jPbndqt+BbCrpQpQKJy7enug=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=WPbLObmI5eAb0UsjPjiNUr79jLBFhGBDmCGswQ79irtiddDZD2UhaHwuf8wU5gtfI 2jAAKuH+RBriYMbp7LixiK6L7pNeOUSxZFezSVb/0m50PA3orzwhQC4NuRPNqwGCwB XDrYpBoLrZhu/1rM+RSTjEWiP7ym60bfW/4Vo1Lg/rKXyJovUrqZu7VNX82OlQTAZC ZyjzajqT1YDtnHxcrXFSGDlm8v77Ug8RcmouOhagCzpz0AYS92XrGo6W7CfyimkdKa Jf1qzBf10+bNkiATeHsiLRqWoz2H91c1xuBWPntnymecG7+43dW6zNirv1E1MWCaQ7 YZ0dyfisBnmwQ== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Bagas Sanjaya , Stefan Roesch , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v1 10/20] docs: document general_profit sysfs knob In-Reply-To: References: <20230123173748.1734238-1-shr@devkernel.io> <20230123173748.1734238-11-shr@devkernel.io> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 09:21:51 -0700 Message-ID: <87h6wfhpi8.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bagas Sanjaya writes: > Seems like the wording is confusing me, so I write the improv: > > ---- >8 ---- > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm > index 7768e90f7a8fef..5309a912ab679b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm > @@ -56,6 +56,6 @@ What: /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/general_profit > Date: January 2023 > KernelVersion: 6.1 > Contact: Linux memory management mailing list > -Description: Measure how effective KSM is. > - general_profit: how effective is KSM. The formula for the > - calculation is in Documentation/admin-guide/mm/ksm.rst. > +Description: Measure the KSM profit. See > + :ref:`KSM documentation ` for details > + on the calculated formula. So the original at least attempted to tell us what "KSM profit" is; the "improved" version makes no such effort. I don't think that is actually better. jon