linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] signal: break out of wait loops on kthread_stop()
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:05:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h73n9ufn.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220711202136.64458-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> (Jason A. Donenfeld's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2022 22:21:36 +0200")

"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> writes:

> I was recently surprised to learn that msleep_interruptible(),
> wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(), and related functions
> simply hung when I called kthread_stop() on kthreads using them. The
> solution to fixing the case with msleep_interruptible() was more simply
> to move to schedule_timeout_interruptible(). Why?
>
> The reason is that msleep_interruptible(), and many functions just like
> it, has a loop like this:
>
>         while (timeout && !signal_pending(current))
>                 timeout = schedule_timeout_interruptible(timeout);
>
> The call to kthread_stop() woke up the thread, so schedule_timeout_
> interruptible() returned early, but because signal_pending() returned
> true, it went back into another timeout, which was never woken up.
>
> This wait loop pattern is common to various pieces of code, and I
> suspect that the subtle misuse in a kthread that caused a deadlock in
> the code I looked at last week is also found elsewhere.
>
> So this commit causes signal_pending() to return true when
> kthread_stop() is called, by setting TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL.
>
> The same also probably applies to the similar kthread_park()
> functionality, but that can be addressed later, as its semantics are
> slightly different.
>
> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> ---
> Changes v3->v4:
> - Don't address park() for now.
> - Don't bother clearing the flag, since the task is about to be freed
>   anyway.
>
>  kernel/kthread.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> index 3c677918d8f2..8888987f2b25 100644
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k)
>  	kthread = to_kthread(k);
>  	set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &kthread->flags);
>  	kthread_unpark(k);
> +	test_and_set_tsk_thread_flag(k, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL);
>  	wake_up_process(k);
>  	wait_for_completion(&kthread->exited);
>  	ret = kthread->result;

Minor it.  Unless I have missed something that should just be
set_tsk_thread_flag.  You aren't using the return value so I don't
think there is any point in testing the previous state of
TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL.

Eric


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-11 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-27 12:00 [PATCH] signal: break out of wait loops on kthread_stop() Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-27 13:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-27 14:54   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-27 14:57     ` [PATCH v2] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-27 19:16       ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-06-28 15:59         ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-28 16:14           ` [PATCH v3] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-04 12:22             ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-11 17:53               ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-11 18:57                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-07-11 20:18                   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-11 20:21                     ` [PATCH v4] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-11 22:05                       ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2022-07-11 23:21                         ` [PATCH v5] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-12  0:00                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-07-12  0:18                             ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-11 22:04                     ` [PATCH v3] " Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h73n9ufn.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).