From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7C2C432BE for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 15:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1573B60F0F for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 15:13:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238866AbhHDPN4 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2021 11:13:56 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42176 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237114AbhHDPNy (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2021 11:13:54 -0400 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1257161004; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 15:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sofa.misterjones.org ([185.219.108.64] helo=why.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBIaS-002win-2M; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 16:13:40 +0100 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 16:13:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87h7g5w8d8.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Rob Herring , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Tom Joseph , , , , , , Lokesh Vutla Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: j721e: Add PCI legacy interrupt support for J721E In-Reply-To: <20210804132912.30685-3-kishon@ti.com> References: <20210804132912.30685-1-kishon@ti.com> <20210804132912.30685-3-kishon@ti.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 185.219.108.64 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: kishon@ti.com, bhelgaas@google.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, tjoseph@cadence.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lokeshvutla@ti.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:29:11 +0100, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > Add PCI legacy interrupt support for J721E. J721E has a single HW > interrupt line for all the four legacy interrupts INTA/INTB/INTC/INTD. > The HW interrupt line connected to GIC is a pulse interrupt whereas > the legacy interrupts by definition is level interrupt. In order to > provide level interrupt functionality to edge interrupt line, PCIe > in J721E has provided IRQ_EOI register. > > However due to Errata ID #i2094 ([1]), EOI feature is not enabled in HW > and only a single pulse interrupt will be generated for every > ASSERT_INTx/DEASSERT_INTx. So my earlier remark stands. If you get a single edge, how do you handle a level that is still high after having handled the interrupt on hardware that has this bug? > > [1] -> J721E DRA829/TDA4VM Processors Silicon Revision 1.1/1.0 SPRZ455A – > DECEMBER 2020 – REVISED AUGUST 2021 > (https://www.ti.com/lit/er/sprz455a/sprz455a.pdf) > > Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I > --- > drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c > index 2ec037c43bd5..c2e7a78dc31f 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pci-j721e.c > @@ -29,6 +29,13 @@ > #define LINK_DOWN BIT(1) > #define J7200_LINK_DOWN BIT(10) > > +#define EOI_REG 0x10 > + > +#define ENABLE_REG_SYS_0 0x100 > +#define STATUS_REG_SYS_0 0x500 > +#define STATUS_CLR_REG_SYS_0 0x700 > +#define INTx_EN(num) (1 << (num)) > + > #define J721E_PCIE_USER_CMD_STATUS 0x4 > #define LINK_TRAINING_ENABLE BIT(0) > > @@ -59,6 +66,7 @@ struct j721e_pcie { > void __iomem *user_cfg_base; > void __iomem *intd_cfg_base; > u32 linkdown_irq_regfield; > + struct irq_domain *legacy_irq_domain; > }; > > enum j721e_pcie_mode { > @@ -121,6 +129,79 @@ static void j721e_pcie_config_link_irq(struct j721e_pcie *pcie) > j721e_pcie_intd_writel(pcie, ENABLE_REG_SYS_2, reg); > } > > +static void j721e_pcie_v1_legacy_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) > +{ > + struct j721e_pcie *pcie = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); > + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); > + int i, virq; > + u32 reg; > + > + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); > + > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_INTX; i++) { > + reg = j721e_pcie_intd_readl(pcie, STATUS_REG_SYS_0); > + if (!(reg & INTx_EN(i))) > + continue; Why do you need to perform multiple reads? Surely reg contains all the bits you need, doesn't it? > + > + virq = irq_find_mapping(pcie->legacy_irq_domain, 3 - i); > + generic_handle_irq(virq); Please combine both lines into a single generic_handle_domain_irq() call. > + j721e_pcie_intd_writel(pcie, STATUS_CLR_REG_SYS_0, INTx_EN(i)); What is the purpose of this write? It feels like this should be a irq_eoi callback. > + } > + > + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); > +} > + > +static int j721e_pcie_intx_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq, irq_hw_number_t hwirq) > +{ > + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &dummy_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq); An INTx interrupt is a level interrupt. Please use the corresponding flow. > + irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct irq_domain_ops j721e_pcie_intx_domain_ops = { > + .map = j721e_pcie_intx_map, > +}; > + > +static int j721e_pcie_config_legacy_irq(struct j721e_pcie *pcie) > +{ > + struct irq_domain *legacy_irq_domain; > + struct device *dev = pcie->dev; > + struct device_node *node = dev->of_node; > + struct device_node *intc_node; > + int irq, i; > + u32 reg; > + > + intc_node = of_get_child_by_name(node, "interrupt-controller"); > + if (!intc_node) { > + dev_dbg(dev, "interrupt-controller node is absent. Legacy INTR not supported\n"); > + return 0; > + } > + > + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(intc_node, 0); > + if (!irq) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map legacy irq\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, j721e_pcie_v1_legacy_irq_handler, pcie); > + > + legacy_irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(intc_node, PCI_NUM_INTX, > + &j721e_pcie_intx_domain_ops, pcie); > + if (!legacy_irq_domain) { > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add irq domain for legacy irqs\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + pcie->legacy_irq_domain = legacy_irq_domain; > + > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_INTX; i++) { > + reg = j721e_pcie_intd_readl(pcie, ENABLE_REG_SYS_0); > + reg |= INTx_EN(i); > + j721e_pcie_intd_writel(pcie, ENABLE_REG_SYS_0, reg); > + } This should be moved to the irq_unmask() callback. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.