From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=mvbx=AL=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978F9C433DF
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 06:07:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B18206BE
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 06:07:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1729557AbgF3GH5 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 30 Jun 2020 02:07:57 -0400
Received: from relmlor2.renesas.com ([210.160.252.172]:59888 "EHLO
        relmlie6.idc.renesas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728928AbgF3GH5 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 30 Jun 2020 02:07:57 -0400
Date:   30 Jun 2020 15:07:55 +0900
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,296,1589209200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="50707825"
Received: from unknown (HELO relmlir6.idc.renesas.com) ([10.200.68.152])
  by relmlie6.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2020 15:07:55 +0900
Received: from mercury.renesas.com (unknown [10.166.252.133])
        by relmlir6.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CDD41C117A;
        Tue, 30 Jun 2020 15:07:55 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <87h7utytlx.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
From:   Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
To:     Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
Cc:     <broonie@kernel.org>, <perex@perex.cz>, <tiwai@suse.com>,
        <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        <digetx@gmail.com>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
        <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <sharadg@nvidia.com>, <mkumard@nvidia.com>,
        <viswanathl@nvidia.com>, <rlokhande@nvidia.com>,
        <dramesh@nvidia.com>, <atalambedu@nvidia.com>,
        <nwartikar@nvidia.com>, <swarren@nvidia.com>,
        <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/23] ASoC: soc-core: Identify 'no_pcm' DAI links for DPCM
In-Reply-To: <1593233625-14961-16-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com>
References: <1593233625-14961-1-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com>
        <1593233625-14961-16-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Hi Sameer

> PCM devices are created for dai links with 'no-pcm' flag as '0'.
> Such DAI links have CPU component which implement pcm_construct()
> and pcm_destruct() callbacks. Based on this, current patch exposes
> a helper function to identify such components and populate 'no_pcm'
> flag for DPCM DAI link.
> 
> This helps to have BE<->BE component links where PCM devices need
> not be created for CPU components involved in the links.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
> ---
(snip)
> +bool soc_component_is_pcm(struct snd_soc_dai_link_component *dlc)
> +{
> +	struct snd_soc_component *component;
> +	struct snd_soc_dai *dai;
> +
> +	for_each_component(component) {
> +		if (!component->driver)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		for_each_component_dais(component, dai) {
> +			if (!dai->name || !dlc->dai_name)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			if (strcmp(dai->name, dlc->dai_name))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			if (component->driver->pcm_construct)
> +				return true;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}

At least my CPU driver doesn't use component:pcm_construct
but is using DAI:pcm_new for some reasons.
I'm not sure checking DAI:pcm here is enough, or not...

Thank you for your help !!

Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto