From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] libnvdimm: Move nd_numa_attribute_group to device_type
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:52:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h839tpo9.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157309901655.1582359.18126990555058555754.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
> A 'struct device_type' instance can carry default attributes for the
> device. Use this facility to remove the export of
> nd_numa_attribute_group and put the responsibility on the core rather
> than leaf implementations to define this attribute.
>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>
> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
can we also expose target_node in a similar way? This allows application
to better understand the node locality of the SCM device.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-12 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-07 3:56 [PATCH 00/16] Memory Hierarchy: Enable target node lookups for reserved memory Dan Williams
2019-11-07 3:56 ` [PATCH 01/16] libnvdimm: Move attribute groups to device type Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:56 ` [PATCH 02/16] libnvdimm: Move region attribute group definition Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:56 ` [PATCH 03/16] libnvdimm: Move nd_device_attribute_group to device_type Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:56 ` [PATCH 04/16] libnvdimm: Move nd_numa_attribute_group " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 9:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2019-11-13 1:26 ` Dan Williams
2019-11-13 6:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-13 6:14 ` Dan Williams
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 05/16] libnvdimm: Move nd_region_attribute_group " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 06/16] libnvdimm: Move nd_mapping_attribute_group " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 07/16] libnvdimm: Move nvdimm_attribute_group " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 08/16] libnvdimm: Move nvdimm_bus_attribute_group " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 09/16] dax: Create a dax device_type Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 10/16] dax: Simplify root read-only definition for the 'resource' attribute Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 11/16] libnvdimm: " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 12/16] dax: Add numa_node to the default device-dax attributes Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 13/16] acpi/mm: Up-level "map to online node" functionality Dan Williams
2019-11-11 11:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-11 23:38 ` Dan Williams
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 14/16] x86/numa: Provide a range-to-target_node lookup facility Dan Williams
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 15/16] libnvdimm/e820: Drop the wrapper around memory_add_physaddr_to_nid Dan Williams
2019-11-07 3:58 ` [PATCH 16/16] libnvdimm/e820: Retrieve and populate correct 'target_node' info Dan Williams
2019-11-09 5:02 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-12 11:42 ` [PATCH 00/16] Memory Hierarchy: Enable target node lookups for reserved memory Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-12 19:37 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h839tpo9.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).