linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>,
	linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandr Iarygin <alexandr.iarygin@cloud.ionos.com>,
	Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>,
	Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bisected: Kernel 4.14 + has 3 times higher write IO latency than Kernel 4.4 with raid1
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 09:46:27 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h86vjhv0.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMGffEkcXcQC+kjwdH0iVSrFDk-o+dp+b3Q1qz4z=R=6D+QqLQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1284 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 05 2019, Jinpu Wang wrote:

> Hi Neil,
>
> For the md higher write IO latency problem, I bisected it to these commits:
>
> 4ad23a97 MD: use per-cpu counter for writes_pending
> 210f7cd percpu-refcount: support synchronous switch to atomic mode.
>
> Do you maybe have an idea? How can we fix it?

Hmmm.... not sure.

My guess is that the set_in_sync() call from md_check_recovery()
is taking a long time, and is being called too often.

Could you try two experiments please.

1/ set  /sys/block/md0/md/safe_mode_delay 
   to 20 or more.  It defaults to about 0.2.

2/ comment out the call the set_in_sync() in md_check_recovery().

Then run the least separately after each of these changes.

I the second one makes a difference, I'd like to know how often it gets
called - and why.  The test
	if ( ! (
		(mddev->sb_flags & ~ (1<<MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING)) ||
		test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery) ||
		test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery) ||
		(mddev->external == 0 && mddev->safemode == 1) ||
		(mddev->safemode == 2
		 && !mddev->in_sync && mddev->recovery_cp == MaxSector)
		))
		return;

should normally return when doing lots of IO - I'd like to know
which condition causes it to not return.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-05 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-02 14:48 Kernel 4.14 + has 100 times higher IO latency than Kernel 4.4 with raid1 Jinpu Wang
2019-08-02 19:52 ` Paul Menzel
2019-08-05  8:34   ` Jinpu Wang
2019-08-05 11:55     ` Bisected: Kernel 4.14 + has 3 times higher write " Jinpu Wang
2019-08-05 23:46       ` NeilBrown [this message]
2019-08-06  4:57         ` riccardofarabia
2019-08-06  7:03           ` Unrelated question and threading (was: Bisected: Kernel 4.14 + has 3 times higher write IO latency than Kernel 4.4 with raid1) Paul Menzel
2019-08-06  7:54         ` Bisected: Kernel 4.14 + has 3 times higher write IO latency than Kernel 4.4 with raid1 Jinpu Wang
2019-08-06 11:57           ` Jinpu Wang
2019-08-06 23:40             ` NeilBrown
2019-08-07  6:36               ` Jinpu Wang
2019-08-07 12:35                 ` Jinpu Wang
2019-08-16  8:10                   ` Jinpu Wang
2019-08-20  0:27                     ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h86vjhv0.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=alexandr.iarygin@cloud.ionos.com \
    --cc=guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com \
    --cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).