From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935378Ab3BTNJx (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:09:53 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:57734 "EHLO mail-pb0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934593Ab3BTNJu (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:09:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:09:44 +0900 Message-ID: <87hal7jfmv.wl%satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com> From: Satoru Takeuchi To: Shuah Khan Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ 0/1] 3.4.33-stable review In-Reply-To: References: <20130218181454.615592566@linuxfoundation.org> <20130220025130.GA32589@kroah.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/23.4 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:31:02 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:50:16PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > >> wrote: > >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.33 release. > >> > There is 1 patch in this series, which will be posted as a response to > >> > this one. If anyone has any issues with it being applied, please let me > >> > know. > >> > > >> > Responses should be made by Wed Feb 20 18:13:44 UTC 2013. > >> > Anything received after that time might be too late. > >> > > >> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > >> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.33-rc1.gz > >> > and the diffstat can be found below. > >> > > >> > thanks, > >> > > >> > greg k-h > >> > > >> > ------------- > >> > >> Patches applied cleanly to 3.0.65, and 3.4.32 > >> Compiled and booted on the following systems: > >> HP EliteBook 6930p Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T9400 @ 2.53GHz > >> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics > >> > >> Reviewed patches > >> > >> Skipped Cross-compile tests > > > > Thanks for testing, your kernel log messages looked correct, right? > > > > greg k-h > > Yes, should have mentioned that I checked dmesg and syslog both and > compared dmesg > with the old dmesg I saved from the previous rc-1 testing for each of > these releases. Didn't > see anything that jumped out at me. I usually save dmesg from rc > cycles to look for regressions > if any from one rc cycle to the next. +1. This kernel can be built and boot without any problem. Building a kernel with this kernel also works fine. * Its dmesg also looks correct. * - Build Machine: debian wheezy x86_64 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 memory: 8GB - Test machine: debian wheezy x86_64(KVM guest on the Build Machine) vCPU: x2 memory: 2GB Thanks, Satoru