From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932260AbWAKLh5@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932260AbWAKLh5 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:37:57 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932316AbWAKLh4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:37:56 -0500
Received: from serverina.hacknight.org ([80.68.90.101]:33800 "EHLO
	serverina.hacknight.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932260AbWAKLh4 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:37:56 -0500
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: realtime-preempt and suspend2
From: Free Ekanayaka <free@64studio.com>
Organization: AGNULA
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:39:16 +0100
Message-ID: <87irsrhwvf.fsf@64studio.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

I'd like  to use both  the realtime-preempt  and the suspend2 patches,
but the seem to conflict in (I tried to apply them on 2.6.15).

Did anybody experiment such combination?

Cheers,

Free