From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Move the remote TLB flush logic out of vmx
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 09:20:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0n0yij7.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b74b538-0b28-7a00-0b26-0f926cd8f37e@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> On 10/06/21 13:20, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>
>>> +static inline void hv_track_root_tdp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, hpa_t root_tdp)
>>> +{
>>> + struct kvm_arch *kvm_arch = &vcpu->kvm->arch;
>>> +
>>> + if (kvm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush == hv_remote_flush_tlb) {
>>> + spin_lock(&kvm_arch->hv_root_tdp_lock);
>>> + vcpu->arch.hv_root_tdp = root_tdp;
>>> + if (root_tdp != kvm_arch->hv_root_tdp)
>>> + kvm_arch->hv_root_tdp = INVALID_PAGE;
>>> + spin_unlock(&kvm_arch->hv_root_tdp_lock);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline void hv_track_root_tdp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, hpa_t root_tdp)
>>> +{
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Super-nitpick: I'd suggest adding /* __ARCH_X86_KVM_KVM_ONHYPERV_H__ */
>> to the second '#endif' and /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV) */ to '#else'
>> and the first one: files/functions tend to grow and it becomes hard to
>> see where the particular '#endif/#else' belongs.
>
> Done, thanks. I've also changed the #if to just "#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV",
> since IS_ENABLED is only needed in C statements.
kvm/queue fails to compile and I blame this change:
In file included from arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.c:16:
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h: In function ‘svm_hv_hardware_setup’:
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h:56:34: error: ‘hv_remote_flush_tlb’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘svm_flush_tlb’?
56 | svm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush = hv_remote_flush_tlb;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| svm_flush_tlb
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h:56:34: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h:58:5: error: ‘hv_remote_flush_tlb_with_range’ undeclared (first use in this function)
58 | hv_remote_flush_tlb_with_range;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:272: arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
In file included from arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c:47:
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h: In function ‘svm_hv_hardware_setup’:
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h:56:34: error: ‘hv_remote_flush_tlb’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘svm_flush_tlb’?
56 | svm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush = hv_remote_flush_tlb;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| svm_flush_tlb
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h:56:34: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h:58:5: error: ‘hv_remote_flush_tlb_with_range’ undeclared (first use in this function)
58 | hv_remote_flush_tlb_with_range;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:272: arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.o] Error 1
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c: In function ‘hardware_setup’:
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:7752:34: error: ‘hv_remote_flush_tlb’ undeclared (first use in this function)
7752 | vmx_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush = hv_remote_flush_tlb;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:7752:34: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:7754:5: error: ‘hv_remote_flush_tlb_with_range’ undeclared (first use in this function)
7754 | hv_remote_flush_tlb_with_range;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(Note: CONFIG_HYPERV can be 'm'.)
The following:
index 96da53edfe83..1c67abf2eba9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_onhyperv.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_onhyperv.h
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
#ifndef __ARCH_X86_KVM_KVM_ONHYPERV_H__
#define __ARCH_X86_KVM_KVM_ONHYPERV_H__
-#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
int hv_remote_flush_tlb_with_range(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_tlb_range *range);
int hv_remote_flush_tlb(struct kvm *kvm);
saves the day for me.
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-11 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-03 15:14 [PATCH v5 0/7] Hyper-V nested virt enlightenments for SVM Vineeth Pillai
2021-06-03 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] hyperv: Detect Nested virtualization support " Vineeth Pillai
2021-06-08 16:59 ` Michael Kelley
2021-06-03 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] hyperv: SVM enlightened TLB flush support flag Vineeth Pillai
2021-06-08 17:04 ` Michael Kelley
2021-06-03 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Move the remote TLB flush logic out of vmx Vineeth Pillai
2021-06-10 11:20 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-06-10 15:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-11 7:20 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2021-06-03 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] KVM: SVM: Software reserved fields Vineeth Pillai
2021-06-03 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] KVM: SVM: hyper-v: Remote TLB flush for SVM Vineeth Pillai
2021-06-08 17:33 ` Michael Kelley
2021-06-03 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] KVM: SVM: hyper-v: Enlightened MSR-Bitmap support Vineeth Pillai
2021-06-03 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] KVM: SVM: hyper-v: Direct Virtual Flush support Vineeth Pillai
2021-06-10 11:16 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-06-10 15:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-14 11:34 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-06-15 14:24 ` Vineeth Pillai
2021-06-10 15:17 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] Hyper-V nested virt enlightenments for SVM Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-11 9:26 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-06-11 9:44 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-06-11 16:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-14 7:47 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k0n0yij7.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=viremana@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).