linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing/module: Move tracepoint out of module.h
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:54:34 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87limkx9m5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332994964.3402.17.camel@edumazet-laptop>

On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:22:44 +0200, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le mercredi 01 février 2012 à 17:18 +1030, Rusty Russell a écrit :
> 
> >  
> > +void __module_get(struct module *module)
> > +{
> > +	if (module) {
> > +		preempt_disable();
> > +		__this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->incs);
> > +		trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
> > +		preempt_enable();
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__module_get);
> > +
> 
> Hi Rusty
> 
> I am wondering why preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() is needed in this
> code.
> 
> this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->incs) is preempt safe...

I agree, it's overkill here:

> @@ -907,10 +907,8 @@ static struct module_attribute modinfo_refcnt =
>  void __module_get(struct module *module)
>  {
>  	if (module) {
> -		preempt_disable();
> -		__this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->incs);
> +		this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->incs);
>  		trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
> -		preempt_enable();
>  	}
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__module_get);

But this one is required:

> @@ -920,15 +918,11 @@ bool try_module_get(struct module *module)
>  	bool ret = true;
>  
>  	if (module) {
> -		preempt_disable();
> -
>  		if (likely(module_is_live(module))) {
> -			__this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->incs);
> +			this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->incs);
>  			trace_module_get(module, _RET_IP_);
>  		} else
>  			ret = false;
> -
> -		preempt_enable();
>  	}
>  	return ret;
>  }

This is to protect against module removal's stop_machine.

> @@ -937,15 +931,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_module_get);
>  void module_put(struct module *module)
>  {
>  	if (module) {
> -		preempt_disable();
>  		smp_wmb(); /* see comment in module_refcount */
> -		__this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->decs);
> +		this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->decs);
>  
>  		trace_module_put(module, _RET_IP_);
>  		/* Maybe they're waiting for us to drop reference? */
>  		if (unlikely(!module_is_live(module)))
>  			wake_up_process(module->waiter);
> -		preempt_enable();
>  	}
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(module_put);

Without the preempt disable, module can vanish immediately
after that increment.

Cheers,
Rusty.
-- 
  How could I marry someone with more hair than me?  http://baldalex.org

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-29  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-16 22:57 [PATCH][GIT PULL][v3.3] tracing: Add header wrappers event_headers_start.h and event_headers_end.h Steven Rostedt
2012-01-17  9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-17 13:32   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-18 12:07     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-18 17:56       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-22 22:59         ` Rusty Russell
2012-01-26  2:41           ` [RFC][PATCH] tracing/module: Move tracepoint out of module.h Steven Rostedt
2012-01-26  2:45             ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-26 10:28             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-26 13:52               ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-26 13:55                 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-26 14:04                   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-26 14:07                     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-26 14:36                     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-26 18:39                       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-27  3:02                         ` Rusty Russell
2012-01-30 11:52                           ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-30 17:28                             ` Steven Rostedt
2012-01-31  3:58                             ` Rusty Russell
2012-01-31 12:20                               ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-31 12:50                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-01  6:48                                   ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-01 13:27                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-02-01 13:49                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-01 14:25                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-29  4:22                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-03-29  5:24                                       ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-02-01  1:10                                 ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-01  7:09                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-30  6:40                       ` Li Zefan
2012-02-17 13:46       ` [tip:perf/core] tracing/softirq: Move __raise_softirq_irqoff() out of header tip-bot for Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87limkx9m5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).