linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/switchtec: Fix init_completion race condition with poll_wait()
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 01:56:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mu8fdck6.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200313183608.2646-1-logang@deltatee.com>

Logan,

Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> writes:

> The call to init_completion() in mrpc_queue_cmd() can theoretically
> race with the call to poll_wait() in switchtec_dev_poll().
>
>   poll()			write()
>     switchtec_dev_poll()   	  switchtec_dev_write()
>       poll_wait(&s->comp.wait);      mrpc_queue_cmd()
> 			               init_completion(&s->comp)
> 				         init_waitqueue_head(&s->comp.wait)

just a nitpick. As you took the liberty to copy the description of the
race, which was btw. disovered by me, verbatim from a changelog written
by someone else w/o providing the courtesy of linking to that original
analysis, allow me the liberty to add the missing link:

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200313174701.148376-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de

> To my knowledge, no one has hit this bug, but we should fix it for
> correctness.

s/,but we should fix/.Fix/ ?

> Fix this by using reinit_completion() instead of init_completion() in
> mrpc_queue_cmd().
>
> Fixes: 080b47def5e5 ("MicroSemi Switchtec management interface driver")
> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

@Bjorn: Can you please hold off on this for a few days until we sorted
        out the remaining issues to avoid potential merge conflicts
        vs. the completion series?

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-17  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-13 18:36 [PATCH] PCI/switchtec: Fix init_completion race condition with poll_wait() Logan Gunthorpe
2020-03-17  0:56 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-03-17  1:25   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-03-17  9:05     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-21 15:53 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Logan Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mu8fdck6.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).