linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@nxp.com>,
	Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 09:45:05 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mufms1oe.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190902102653.6d477e16@naga>

Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de> writes:
> On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 14:01:17 +1000
> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:
>> > Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de> writes:  
>> ...
>> >> @@ -295,6 +279,12 @@ static inline int current_is_64bit(void)
>> >>  }
>> >>  
>> >>  #else  /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>> >> +static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
>> >> +{
>> >> +	return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */  
>> >
>> > Ending the PPC64 else case here, and then restarting it below with an
>> > ifndef means we end up with two parts of the file that define 32-bit
>> > code, with a common chunk in the middle, which I dislike.
>> >
>> > I'd rather you add the empty read_user_stack_slow() in the existing
>> > #else section and then move read_user_stack_32() below the whole ifdef
>> > PPC64/else/endif section.
>> >
>> > Is there some reason that doesn't work?  
>> 
>> Gah, I missed that you split the whole file later in the series. Any
>> reason you did it in two steps rather than moving patch 6 earlier in the
>> series?
>
> To make this patch readable.

But it's not very readable :)

You also retained the comment about the 32-bit behaviour which is now a
bit confusing, because the function is used on both 32 & 64-bit.

I think moving it as I suggested in my first reply makes for a better
diff, something like eg:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
index c84bbd4298a0..82c0f81b89a5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
@@ -165,22 +165,6 @@ static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret)
 	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 8);
 }
 
-static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
-{
-	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
-	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
-		return -EFAULT;
-
-	pagefault_disable();
-	if (!__get_user_inatomic(*ret, ptr)) {
-		pagefault_enable();
-		return 0;
-	}
-	pagefault_enable();
-
-	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4);
-}
-
 static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
 {
 	if (!sp || (sp & 7) || sp > (is_64 ? TASK_SIZE : 0x100000000UL) - 32)
@@ -295,27 +279,6 @@ static inline int current_is_64bit(void)
 }
 
 #else  /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
-/*
- * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page create a
- * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading
- * the page tables.  Since this is called at interrupt level,
- * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
- */
-static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
-{
-	int rc;
-
-	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
-	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
-		return -EFAULT;
-
-	pagefault_disable();
-	rc = __get_user_inatomic(*ret, ptr);
-	pagefault_enable();
-
-	return rc;
-}
-
 static inline void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
 					  struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
@@ -333,6 +296,11 @@ static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #define __SIGNAL_FRAMESIZE32	__SIGNAL_FRAMESIZE
 #define sigcontext32		sigcontext
 #define mcontext32		mcontext
@@ -341,6 +309,33 @@ static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
 
+static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+{
+	int rc;
+
+	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
+	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	pagefault_disable();
+	rc = __get_user_inatomic(*ret, ptr);
+	pagefault_enable();
+
+	/*
+	 * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page() create a
+	 * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading the
+	 * page tables. Since this is called at interrupt level, do_page_fault()
+	 * won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
+	 *
+	 * On 64-bit if the access faults we fall back to
+	 * read_user_stack_slow(), see the comment there for more details.
+	 */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) && rc)
+		return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4);
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
 /*
  * Layout for non-RT signal frames
  */


cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-02 23:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-30 21:03 [PATCH v7 0/6] Disable compat cruft on ppc64le v7 Michal Suchanek
2019-08-30 21:03 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] powerpc: Add back __ARCH_WANT_SYS_LLSEEK macro Michal Suchanek
2019-08-30 21:03 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] powerpc: move common register copy functions from signal_32.c to signal.c Michal Suchanek
2019-08-30 21:03 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32 Michal Suchanek
2019-09-02  3:53   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-02  4:01     ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-02  8:26       ` Michal Suchánek
2019-09-02 23:45         ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2019-08-30 21:03 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] powerpc/64: make buildable without CONFIG_COMPAT Michal Suchanek
2019-08-31  6:43   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-08-31 13:02   ` Michal Suchánek
2019-08-30 21:03 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] powerpc/64: Make COMPAT user-selectable disabled on littleendian by default Michal Suchanek
2019-09-02  2:03   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-02  9:42     ` Michal Suchánek
2019-09-03  0:00       ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-14 10:22         ` Michal Suchánek
2019-09-18  5:36           ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-02 13:00     ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-02 23:53       ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-03  5:21         ` Christophe Leroy
2019-08-30 21:03 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] powerpc/perf: split callchain.c by bitness Michal Suchanek
2019-08-31 18:51   ` Michal Suchánek
2019-08-31  6:41 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] Disable compat cruft on ppc64le v7 Christophe Leroy
2019-08-31 18:03   ` Michal Suchánek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mufms1oe.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=allison@lohutok.net \
    --cc=andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=diana.craciun@nxp.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=firoz.khan@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).