From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752098AbcFDLpl (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2016 07:45:41 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:34986 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751852AbcFDLph (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2016 07:45:37 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,417,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="995121153" From: Jani Nikula To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Markus Heiser , Daniel Vetter , Grant Likely , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Dan Allen , Russel Winder , Keith Packard , LKML , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx In-Reply-To: <20160603150416.55a6c966@lwn.net> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <877fec7gfm.fsf@intel.com> <36300F5F-C3F3-4A55-9257-788CF9F96CA4@darmarit.de> <878tyrbo36.fsf@intel.com> <5369C8B8-47F2-4B67-A314-5EB5471ABA00@darmarit.de> <87k2ibfh0x.fsf@intel.com> <20160603150416.55a6c966@lwn.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+9~g73339ad (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 14:45:32 +0300 Message-ID: <87mvn189er.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 04 Jun 2016, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 30 May 2016 23:05:34 +0300 > Jani Nikula wrote: > >> To be clear, the "sphinx-for-docs-next" branch of [1], [2] is what I >> propose to merge at this time. There's the Sphinx configuration, kernel >> build integration, Sphinx kernel-doc extension, tons of kernel-doc >> updates, etc. > > OK, I do believe that I am ready to do that. Many, many thanks for doing > this work! Please drop me a note when you think that the branch is ready > to go. In case you missed the patch bomb in your inbox, I think it's ready now. ;) >> There is no DocBook tmpl conversion; all of that is left >> to the authors (owners, maintainers) of the documents, but this enables >> them to focus on that part. > > I would like to have some actual documents in there in the near future, > so that interested folks have something to look at and start with. Maybe > I'll do that myself with some of the docbooks without active maintainers, > or even, maybe, some of the .txt files :) So we'll be working on gpu.tmpl next and I'll look at Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt too. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center