* [PATCH] Documentation: in_irq() cleanup
@ 2021-08-13 14:47 Changbin Du
2021-08-13 15:44 ` Jonathan Corbet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2021-08-13 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet
Cc: Federico Vaga, Alex Shi, linux-doc, linux-kernel, Changbin Du
Replace the obsolete and ambiguos macro in_irq() with new
macro in_hardirq().
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst | 4 ++--
Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/locking.rst | 4 ++--
Documentation/translations/zh_CN/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst | 2 +-
5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
index df65c19aa7df..f514cec8e16b 100644
--- a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ fast: frequently it simply acknowledges the interrupt, marks a 'software
interrupt' for execution and exits.
You can tell you are in a hardware interrupt, because
-:c:func:`in_irq()` returns true.
+:c:func:`in_hardirq()` returns true.
.. warning::
diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
index ed1284c6f078..94232ed1d592 100644
--- a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
@@ -1406,7 +1406,7 @@ bh
half will be running at any time.
Hardware Interrupt / Hardware IRQ
- Hardware interrupt request. in_irq() returns true in a
+ Hardware interrupt request. in_hardirq() returns true in a
hardware interrupt handler.
Interrupt Context
@@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ SMP
(``CONFIG_SMP=y``).
Software Interrupt / softirq
- Software interrupt handler. in_irq() returns false;
+ Software interrupt handler. in_hardirq() returns false;
in_softirq() returns true. Tasklets and softirqs both
fall into the category of 'software interrupts'.
diff --git a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
index f6beb385b4ac..a2474e1f235e 100644
--- a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ i gestori d'interruzioni devono essere veloci: spesso si limitano
esclusivamente a notificare la presa in carico dell'interruzione,
programmare una 'interruzione software' per l'esecuzione e quindi terminare.
-Potete dire d'essere in una interruzione hardware perché :c:func:`in_irq()`
+Potete dire d'essere in una interruzione hardware perché :c:func:`in_hardirq()`
ritorna vero.
.. warning::
diff --git a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/locking.rst b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
index 1e7c84def369..1efb8293bf1f 100644
--- a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
@@ -1459,11 +1459,11 @@ contesto utente
che hardware.
interruzione hardware
- Richiesta di interruzione hardware. in_irq() ritorna vero in un
+ Richiesta di interruzione hardware. in_hardirq() ritorna vero in un
gestore d'interruzioni hardware.
interruzione software / softirq
- Gestore di interruzioni software: in_irq() ritorna falso;
+ Gestore di interruzioni software: in_hardirq() ritorna falso;
in_softirq() ritorna vero. I tasklet e le softirq sono entrambi
considerati 'interruzioni software'.
diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
index ab974faddecf..877921adb5bb 100644
--- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
它将被排队(或丢弃)。因为它会关闭中断,所以处理程序必须很快:通常它只是
确认中断,标记一个“软件中断”以执行并退出。
-您可以通过 :c:func:`in_irq()` 返回真来判断您处于硬件中断状态。
+您可以通过 :c:func:`in_hardirq()` 返回真来判断您处于硬件中断状态。
.. warning::
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: in_irq() cleanup
2021-08-13 14:47 [PATCH] Documentation: in_irq() cleanup Changbin Du
@ 2021-08-13 15:44 ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-08-14 1:44 ` Changbin Du
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2021-08-13 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Changbin Du; +Cc: Federico Vaga, Alex Shi, linux-doc, linux-kernel, Changbin Du
Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> writes:
> Replace the obsolete and ambiguos macro in_irq() with new
> macro in_hardirq().
>
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst | 2 +-
> Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst | 4 ++--
> Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst | 2 +-
> Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/locking.rst | 4 ++--
> Documentation/translations/zh_CN/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
> index df65c19aa7df..f514cec8e16b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ fast: frequently it simply acknowledges the interrupt, marks a 'software
> interrupt' for execution and exits.
>
> You can tell you are in a hardware interrupt, because
> -:c:func:`in_irq()` returns true.
> +:c:func:`in_hardirq()` returns true.
While you're in the neighborhood, can you please get rid of the :c:func:
markup? We've not needed that for some time now; simply saying
in_hardirq() is sufficient.
Thanks,
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation: in_irq() cleanup
2021-08-13 15:44 ` Jonathan Corbet
@ 2021-08-14 1:44 ` Changbin Du
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Changbin Du @ 2021-08-14 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet
Cc: Changbin Du, Federico Vaga, Alex Shi, linux-doc, linux-kernel
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:44:28AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Replace the obsolete and ambiguos macro in_irq() with new
> > macro in_hardirq().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst | 2 +-
> > Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst | 4 ++--
> > Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst | 2 +-
> > Documentation/translations/it_IT/kernel-hacking/locking.rst | 4 ++--
> > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst | 2 +-
> > 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
> > index df65c19aa7df..f514cec8e16b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst
> > @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ fast: frequently it simply acknowledges the interrupt, marks a 'software
> > interrupt' for execution and exits.
> >
> > You can tell you are in a hardware interrupt, because
> > -:c:func:`in_irq()` returns true.
> > +:c:func:`in_hardirq()` returns true.
>
> While you're in the neighborhood, can you please get rid of the :c:func:
> markup? We've not needed that for some time now; simply saying
> in_hardirq() is sufficient.
>
No problem, will updaate it soon.
> Thanks,
>
> jon
--
Cheers,
Changbin Du
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-14 1:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-13 14:47 [PATCH] Documentation: in_irq() cleanup Changbin Du
2021-08-13 15:44 ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-08-14 1:44 ` Changbin Du
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).