From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754498Ab2JOS4r (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:56:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:41598 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753122Ab2JOS4p (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:56:45 -0400 From: Peter Korsgaard To: "Philip\, Avinash" Cc: , , , afzal@ti.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, ivan.djelic@parrot.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: nand: omap2: Update nerrors using ecc.strength References: <1349274589-11389-1-git-send-email-avinashphilip@ti.com> <1349274589-11389-2-git-send-email-avinashphilip@ti.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:56:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1349274589-11389-2-git-send-email-avinashphilip@ti.com> (Avinash Philip's message of "Wed, 3 Oct 2012 19:59:46 +0530") Message-ID: <87obk3va1j.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> Philip, Avinash writes: > Update number of errors using nand ecc strength. > Also add macro definitions BCH8_ERROR_MAX & BCH4_ERROR_MAX > Signed-off-by: Philip, Avinash > --- > :100644 100644 5b31386... af511a9... M drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c > drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c > index 5b31386..af511a9 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c > @@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ > #define ECCCLEAR 0x100 > #define ECC1 0x1 > +#define BCH8_MAX_ERROR 8 /* upto 8 bit coorectable */ > +#define BCH4_MAX_ERROR 4 /* upto 4 bit correctable */ First 'correctable' misspelled. I don't personally think these defines improve readability very much compared to to just using 4/8, though. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard