From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120D4C3DA7D for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 08:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231172AbjAEIFE (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2023 03:05:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50774 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231409AbjAEIFA (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2023 03:05:00 -0500 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5838F4435A; Thu, 5 Jan 2023 00:04:59 -0800 (PST) From: John Ogness DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1672905896; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LBxY4x0lJECD3Q95isd05EdO7m7NX7/uYbQPzo0bI20=; b=0Dgu5ClJpyieIj/9iUZxjMDW8ZJTVlPIqbiIIB5fG5R3kHFQJnrurr6kHDTZKle0oJL0mg OTnCbmLG2qKdm7+hbkk/BIx0Y50Dq4JG3csa8Nik4hZa6FeOo6qAqLHaSdW6/BnNvw9iTB CWTnysWkJEwhnHHQLTG1ktMai44ctieGiIS5zW84DV4Pcth2sHqKl2e9T/bq1BmXmh9xlZ 6CIBvV48TZrGH1/SZ5gO8z/+5gkMVszNFqXVDZ6qv7fX1Om9rCbOC/FUTN1WaDCj6L2rfb BQG8vZWhbsFxj2OAbrG8ePSgISnOFnzk8dcQ67WBDLGgOjP5vW1R67k0V7QLeA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1672905896; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LBxY4x0lJECD3Q95isd05EdO7m7NX7/uYbQPzo0bI20=; b=tsKbdvhJYyQ43xpUDWVbw6FN9BbvrqYVO/pzQdu+9Tvot04pDwEtjq7LEPHq8nmTcmf1Uk p3rew6Rk5+ddrUDQ== To: "Paul E. McKenney" , rcu@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Petr Mladek Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 27/27] rcu: Remove CONFIG_SRCU In-Reply-To: <20230105003813.1770367-27-paulmck@kernel.org> References: <20230105003759.GA1769545@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20230105003813.1770367-27-paulmck@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2023 09:10:16 +0106 Message-ID: <87r0w9csqn.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023-01-04, "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > Now that all references to CONFIG_SRCU have been removed, it is time to > remove CONFIG_SRCU itself. I think "all references" is a bit misleading since there still are several places in the kernel code that use it: $ git grep CONFIG_SRCU drivers/base/core.c:#ifdef CONFIG_SRCU drivers/base/core.c:#else /* !CONFIG_SRCU */ drivers/base/core.c:#endif /* !CONFIG_SRCU */ fs/locks.c:#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SRCU) fs/locks.c:#else /* !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SRCU) */ fs/locks.c:#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SRCU) */ kernel/notifier.c:#ifdef CONFIG_SRCU kernel/notifier.c:#endif /* CONFIG_SRCU */ Should those be removed before this patch? John Ogness