From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA87C48BDF for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084FF613C6 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231259AbhFJOUl (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:20:41 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f50.google.com ([209.85.216.50]:52934 "EHLO mail-pj1-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230311AbhFJOUk (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:20:40 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f50.google.com with SMTP id h16so3745236pjv.2; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 07:18:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Qr+1IlJcgDNDchkAHw4h++pZkdHdyTM7HD3qP1Vs7HQ=; b=qrwcXgGM1x7QALpPDd+KCgaUYfaG3b9bFaQT3jFcf95Xbsk2cqDKXblyVYwGoFg2ty 256uo970KVHY5Ut8qtlWoyYcREDQI0N2nFSNuFd5uOTTSd+T5Y/Rarm0/20sRHahxTfr XGIWs+NAOJllN460pdFynNP5sl0uSaTOi8F6YfQB/liuupsUB5E8wiaK3ISWQrE1ZORc AXAIbkG9gO09Fwyp559l73T5kqN1GFeCZ4/reb7MIK70IWVv2nfS5Jc2/5hEIuMHY69v MyvoqruWTi/DJAbyXQgDK8vFLfykvUDkA+g3HGTdOjubms8CNNIvjJ8QKTkK296NxomG 01/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Qr+1IlJcgDNDchkAHw4h++pZkdHdyTM7HD3qP1Vs7HQ=; b=sdFUv+hNrJt+OywWP41X5jizc+V+TJUghDzy3tXqLM2OtC1U8FD2VbL7pBbjXMBb1Z 3w3jM/dknh8pbL32r/FVLyP+eHzalpJDJfvmaKPHVKeinBm1WVonEPeBMjboKQSwqv/w pY2lKGLdKPNSynSxIsvkj54J/Jek35md+QOIrca/GjEMlOzFAp5q7NC3ixVziY8PRzJ6 XpMM+9mh4dLVCyEzKP+8rLJ1AzfUSzctRq2UJ4G0JKo4dp2R0oeV0FIbSIpKNZTrVQV+ fOAoAcHhpsTs8LUfWrsN2CcCXNmP7sxu0WbmWDkJzfLCgoibM46mBJX7UxzQEWhf2JIU FzRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533cuEzfQqfwkz0K9D3Z13jUqHHAm4+qRB5A1+PFAoi4dOmOAoWy OZKMxANcBSW9gmRgwS/y+XE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxervl3oVnLBCHRuQ8kkSIWXHCgBRo0ufvlwRVsg78SmcUvr6ue2xbrVsYa3LDG+S1Mp03vKQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f197:: with SMTP id bv23mr3539616pjb.113.1623334649554; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 07:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (122x211x248x161.ap122.ftth.ucom.ne.jp. [122.211.248.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 23sm2759820pjw.28.2021.06.10.07.17.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 07:17:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Punit Agrawal To: Marc Zyngier Cc: helgaas@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, wqu@suse.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, pgwipeout@gmail.com, ardb@kernel.org, briannorris@chromium.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI: of: Improvements to handle 64-bit attribute for non-prefetchable ranges References: <20210607112856.3499682-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com> <87lf7jqavd.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:17:26 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87lf7jqavd.wl-maz@kernel.org> (Marc Zyngier's message of "Wed, 09 Jun 2021 17:08:22 +0100") Message-ID: <87r1h9kdmx.fsf@stealth> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, Marc Zyngier writes: > Hi Punit, > > On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 12:28:52 +0100, > Punit Agrawal wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> This is the third iteration to improve handling of the 64-bit >> attribute on non-prefetchable host bridge ranges. Previous version can >> be found at [0][1]. >> >> This version is a small update over the previous version - changelog >> below. If there is no futher feedback on the patches, please consider >> merging them. > > Thanks for this. This brings my test machine back to life: > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier > Tested-by: Marc Zyngier Thanks for taking the patches for a spin. Based on the comments on Patch 1, there'll at least be another update. I'll copy you when I send that out. Thanks, Punit [...]