From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1750966AbdEBC3X (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 1 May 2017 22:29:23 -0400
Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:33824 "EHLO mga14.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750823AbdEBC3W (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 1 May 2017 22:29:22 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,402,1488873600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="96453901"
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        kitsunyan <kitsunyan@inbox.ru>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Chris Mason" <clm@fb.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>, <lkp@01.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [sched/fair] 4c77b18cf8: hackbench.throughput -14.4% regression
References: <87lgsh3hbn.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
        <20170307075303.GS6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 10:29:19 +0800
In-Reply-To: <20170307075303.GS6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (Peter
        Zijlstra's message of "Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:53:03 +0100")
Message-ID: <87r308f0u8.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi, Peter,

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:18:36AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Greeting,
>> 
>> FYI, we noticed a -14.4% regression of hackbench.throughput due to commit:
>
> Yeah, I know ... this patch is a mixed bag, some like it, some hate it.
>
> But given it was fingered by a human doing desktopy things that trumps
> artificial benchmark.
>
> Still, I'll try and see if I can fix thing once I find a spare moment.

Do you have any update for this regression?

Don't want to push you, just want to get the latest status.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying