"David Schwartz" writes: > It occurs to me that it might not be a bad idea to have a short blurb that > could be included in individual files that clarifies that the file is part > of a GPL'd distribution but that's clear that it doesn't impose any > additional restrictions. Here's a stab at such a notice just off the top of > my head: [snip] I don't understand the desire for a notice that is clearly redundant. Due to the nature of the GPL (version 1 or 2), licensing an entire work under it is exactly equivalent to licensing all of the component parts individually under it. -- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard