Re: Linux 5.1-rc5

[Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>]

[ Cc += Nick & Aneesh & Paul ]

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:19 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>> Can we please have the page refcount overflow fixes out on the list
>> for review, even if it is after the fact?
>
> They were actually on a list for review long before the fact, but it
> was the security mailing list. The issue actually got discussed back
> in January along with early versions of the patches, but then we
> dropped the ball because it just wasn't on anybody's radar and it got
> resurrected late March. Willy wrote a rather bigger patch-series, and
> review of that is what then resulted in those commits. So they may
> look recent, but that's just because the original patches got
> seriously edited down and rewritten.
>
> That said, powerpc and s390 should at least look at maybe adding a
> check for the page ref in their gup paths too. Powerpc has the special
> gup_hugepte() case

Which uses page_cache_add_speculative(), which handles the case of the
refcount being zero but not overflow. So that looks like it needs
fixing.

We also have follow_huge_pd() that should use try_get_page().

And we have a few uses of bare get_page() in KVM code which might be
subject to the same attack.

cheers