From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
pmladek@suse.com, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 rcu 0/8] NMI-safe SRCU reader API
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:44:55 +0206 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tu3z334g.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019191418.GF5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
On 2022-10-19, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
> my thought is to make this change in the name of bisectability,
> then produce a new srcunmisafe branch. The printk() series would
> then need to rebase or remerge this new series.
>
> John, would that work for you?
Yes, that is fine. It really is just a bisectability issue, so for the
review of my v2 series it does not matter. I will rebase on the new
branch for my v3. ;-)
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-21 14:46 [PATCH rcu 0/4] NMI-safe SRCU reader API Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-21 14:46 ` [PATCH RFC rcu 1/4] srcu: Convert ->srcu_lock_count and ->srcu_unlock_count to atomic Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-21 14:46 ` [PATCH RFC rcu 2/4] srcu: Create and srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() and srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-21 14:46 ` [PATCH RFC rcu 3/4] srcu: Check for consistent per-CPU per-srcu_struct NMI safety Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-21 14:46 ` [PATCH RFC rcu 4/4] srcu: Check for consistent global " Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v2 rcu 0/8] NMI-safe SRCU reader API Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 rcu 1/8] srcu: Convert ->srcu_lock_count and ->srcu_unlock_count to atomic Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-30 15:02 ` John Ogness
2022-09-30 15:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-30 20:37 ` John Ogness
2022-10-01 16:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 rcu 2/8] srcu: Create an srcu_read_lock_nmisafe() and srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe() Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 15:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-02 15:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-02 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 16:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 21:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-02 23:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-03 9:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-03 11:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-18 14:31 ` John Ogness
2022-10-18 15:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 rcu 3/8] srcu: Check for consistent per-CPU per-srcu_struct NMI safety Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 22:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-02 23:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-03 10:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-03 11:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-03 12:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-03 13:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-03 13:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 rcu 4/8] srcu: Check for consistent global " Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 rcu 5/8] arch/x86: Add ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 rcu 6/8] arch/arm64: " Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-05 11:12 ` Mark Rutland
2022-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 rcu 7/8] arch/loongarch: " Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-29 18:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 rcu 8/8] arch/s390: " Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-03 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 rcu 0/8] NMI-safe SRCU reader API Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-03 16:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-14 22:47 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-14 22:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-18 10:33 ` John Ogness
2022-10-18 15:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-18 18:44 ` John Ogness
2022-10-18 18:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-18 21:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 11:13 ` John Ogness
2022-10-19 19:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-19 21:38 ` John Ogness [this message]
2022-10-19 22:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-20 22:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-20 22:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-21 12:27 ` John Ogness
2022-10-21 13:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-21 18:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-24 6:15 ` John Ogness
2022-10-24 13:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-27 9:31 ` John Ogness
2022-10-27 14:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-27 14:39 ` John Ogness
2022-10-27 16:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tu3z334g.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).