From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Jiang Jiasheng <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: X86: Potential 'index out of range' bug
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 13:07:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tuiy3qtc.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YTI5SYVTJHiMdm+W@google.com>
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Jiang Jiasheng <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn> writes:
>>
>> > The kvm_get_vcpu() will call for the array_index_nospec()
>> > with the value of atomic_read(&(v->kvm)->online_vcpus) as size,
>> > and the value of constant '0' as index.
>> > If the size is also '0', it will be unreasonabe
>> > that the index is no less than the size.
>> >
>>
>> Can this really happen?
>>
>> 'online_vcpus' is never decreased, it is increased with every
>> kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu() call when a new vCPU is created and is set to
>> 0 when all vCPUs are destroyed (kvm_free_vcpus()).
>>
>> kvm_guest_time_update() takes a vcpu as a parameter, this means that at
>> least 1 vCPU is currently present so 'online_vcpus' just can't be zero.
>
> Agreed, but doing kvm_get_vcpu() is ugly and overkill.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 86539c1686fa..cc1cb9a401cd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2969,7 +2969,7 @@ static int kvm_guest_time_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> offsetof(struct compat_vcpu_info, time));
> if (vcpu->xen.vcpu_time_info_set)
> kvm_setup_pvclock_page(v, &vcpu->xen.vcpu_time_info_cache, 0);
> - if (v == kvm_get_vcpu(v->kvm, 0))
> + if (!kvm_vcpu_get_idx(v))
Do we really need to keep kvm_vcpu_get_idx() around though? It has only
3 users, all in arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.[ch], and the inline simpy returns
'vcpu->vcpu_idx'.
> kvm_hv_setup_tsc_page(v->kvm, &vcpu->hv_clock);
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-06 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-03 7:55 [PATCH 4/4] KVM: X86: Potential 'index out of range' bug Jiang Jiasheng
2021-09-03 11:44 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-03 15:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-06 11:07 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2021-09-08 18:42 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tuiy3qtc.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).