linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: "John Youn" <John.Youn@synopsys.com>,
	"Yunzhi Li" <lyz@rock-chips.com>,
	"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Julius Werner" <jwerner@chromium.org>,
	"Herrero, Gregory" <gregory.herrero@intel.com>,
	"Kaukab, Yousaf" <yousaf.kaukab@intel.com>,
	"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>,
	"Alan Stern" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	"Ming Lei" <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
	"John Youn" <johnyoun@synopsys.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] usb: dwc2: host: Assume all devices are on one single_tt hub
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:20:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87twoheqyw.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=UW-AbY9GnYOS_2V=dZTkL6NiZsO4urpf==qjcRDaEMDA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4013 bytes --]


Hi,

Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> writes:
>> Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> writes:
>>> Until we have logic to determine which devices share the same TT let's
>>> add logic to assume that all devices on a given dwc2 controller are on
>>> one single_tt hub.  This is better than the previous code that assumed
>>> that all devices were on one multi_tt hub, since single_tt hubs
>>> appear (in my experience) to be much more common and any schedule that
>>> would work on a single_tt hub will also work on a multi_tt hub.  This
>>> will prevent more than 8 total low/full speed devices to be on the bus
>>> at one time, but that's a reasonable restriction until we've made things
>>> smarter.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Assuming single_tt is new for v3; not terribly well tested (yet).
>>>
>>> Changes in v2: None
>>>
>>>  drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h      |  1 +
>>>  drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_queue.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
>>> index 567ee2c9e69f..09aa2b5ae29e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
>>> @@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ struct dwc2_hsotg {
>>>       u16 periodic_usecs;
>>>       unsigned long periodic_bitmap[DIV_ROUND_UP(TOTAL_PERIODIC_USEC,
>>>                                                  BITS_PER_LONG)];
>>> +     bool has_split[8];
>>
>> why don't you use a u8 instead then just set each bit for each
>> "has_split" you need to take care of. This array is kinda ugly.
>
> Let's actually drop this patch completely.  Julius and I sat down and
> he talked me through things, and with my current understanding the
> current microframe scheduler in dwc2 is broken enough that small
> little band-aids like this will do little more than just push the
> problems around.
>
> I'm a good portion of the way through a better microframe scheduler.
> I have no doubt that it won't be perfect, but hopefully it will at
> least be based in reality...
>
> My latest thinking on the patches in this series:
>
> 1. usb: dwc2: rockchip: Make the max_transfer_size automatic
>
> I'll probably separate this out into its own patch so I can stop
> sending it as part of this series.  ...or if someone wanted to land it
> then I won't bother.
>
>
> 2. usb: dwc2: host: Get aligned DMA in a more supported way
>
> Still can land any time and has good benefits.  I believe that I can't
> separate this because it will cause conflicts with scheduler patches.
>
>
> 3. usb: dwc2: host: Add scheduler tracing
>
> Would be nice to land.
>
>
> 4. usb: dwc2: host: Rewrite the microframe scheduler
> 5. usb: dwc2: host: Keep track of and use our scheduled microframe
> 6. usb: dwc2: host: Assume all devices are on one single_tt hub
>
> Please drop patches 4-6 right now.
>
>
> 7. usb: dwc2: host: Add a delay before releasing periodic bandwidth
> 8. usb: dwc2: host: Giveback URB in tasklet context

if you can, it's best to send a new series with the changes. This makes
mine and John's life a lot easier :-)

> I'll probably move these back up in the series (like in v2) and put
> microframe rewrite atop them.  With my current understanding the
> scheduling is so broken today that the concerns Alan brought up can
> wait until we have a proper scheduler to be addressed.  In the
> meantime getting the huge boost in interrupt speed will help with
> dwc2's correctness (and performance) because it means we're much less
> likely to miss SOF interrupts.
>
> If anyone has any review time, giving a review to v2 of these patches
> would be helpful.  Otherwise I'll double check that v2 still looks
> good with my current understanding and eventually post them again.

That would have to be someone experienced with that IP. I don't even
have docs :-)

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-19 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-17  0:51 [PATCH v3 0/8] dwc2: Fix uframe scheduler + speed up the interrupt handler quite a bit Douglas Anderson
2015-11-17  0:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] usb: dwc2: rockchip: Make the max_transfer_size automatic Douglas Anderson
2015-11-17  0:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] usb: dwc2: host: Get aligned DMA in a more supported way Douglas Anderson
2015-11-17  0:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] usb: dwc2: host: Add scheduler tracing Douglas Anderson
2015-11-17  0:51 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] usb: dwc2: host: Rewrite the microframe scheduler Douglas Anderson
2015-11-17  0:51 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] usb: dwc2: host: Keep track of and use our scheduled microframe Douglas Anderson
2015-11-17  0:51 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] usb: dwc2: host: Assume all devices are on one single_tt hub Douglas Anderson
2015-11-17 21:22   ` Doug Anderson
2015-11-19 15:34   ` Felipe Balbi
2015-11-19 16:27     ` Doug Anderson
2015-11-19 19:20       ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2015-11-20  4:33       ` John Youn
2015-11-24  0:28         ` Doug Anderson
2015-11-26  0:44           ` Doug Anderson
2015-11-17  0:51 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] usb: dwc2: host: Add a delay before releasing periodic bandwidth Douglas Anderson
2015-11-17  0:51 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] usb: dwc2: host: Giveback URB in tasklet context Douglas Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87twoheqyw.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=John.Youn@synopsys.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dinguyen@opensource.altera.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gregory.herrero@intel.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=johnyoun@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyz@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=yousaf.kaukab@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).