From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77BDC4743C for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 00:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC84F6139A for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 00:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231163AbhFEApi (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 20:45:38 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:56540 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230169AbhFEAph (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2021 20:45:37 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1622853829; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7JK99x2aCiwHcKoHUwYLrlYiiXcsZf3XTECQ6JDeNtg=; b=2dFyG/SfB92H9PmpDRA7soX43NyiXJu1t6mOaoUOGo0g0VHQ/IOOojofkC2yqpX/00XBD6 jzjlQEl/0v1ybdFTNz4DbGuWgRASZTpxu8tWzCFMf96E6+CjEreuKTSUvBeD9DEli2aony WwWO2/QqLyCJi8z68NoQ5mje4AYZjR09I94DNY/am7et2qYz8GMnpk4JIdKxqDoIKn+jOO LB9yrSeuiqxVNzjwOJXDoAHDZr9K0EiHFDFmG4MOZrvUgcvGDj/f+h91GkWO4oB4KMhHMH /U1i92y7qYJECjA38oaT9Gkpcs/UzFTy4MngINYpBOXEiVda3xwthcuBRngZCA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1622853829; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7JK99x2aCiwHcKoHUwYLrlYiiXcsZf3XTECQ6JDeNtg=; b=3GLJtO/fwiRXRqqM30wtOeGyzNH971QME09g79BySukpMaZ497oO0wX9kbhyAnbqE1v9bN WAPj0Z9sYg5l+qCA== To: Andres Freund Cc: Pavel Begunkov , Jens Axboe , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Darren Hart , Davidlohr Bueso , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] io_uring: implement futex wait In-Reply-To: <20210603190338.gfykgkc7ac2akvdt@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <409a624c-de75-0ee5-b65f-ee09fff34809@gmail.com> <5ab4c8bd-3e82-e87b-1ae8-3b32ced72009@gmail.com> <87sg211ccj.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20210603190338.gfykgkc7ac2akvdt@alap3.anarazel.de> Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 02:43:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87v96tywcb.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andres, On Thu, Jun 03 2021 at 12:03, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2021-06-01 23:53:00 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> You surely made your point that this is well thought out. > > Really impressed with your effort to generously interpret the first > version of a proof of concept patch that explicitly was aimed at getting > feedback on the basic design and the different use cases. feedback on what? There is absolutely no description of design and obviously there is no use case either. So what do you expect me to be generous about? Thanks, tglx