From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BADC54EE9 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 15:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230261AbiISPqz (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:46:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34134 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229910AbiISPqu (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:46:50 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C70F11C3F; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]:51230) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1oaIyt-000hY1-Nw; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:46:47 -0600 Received: from ip68-110-29-46.om.om.cox.net ([68.110.29.46]:34848 helo=email.froward.int.ebiederm.org.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1oaIys-007k7X-Mh; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:46:47 -0600 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: Tycho Andersen Cc: Al Viro , Oleg Nesterov , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Miklos Szeredi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220728091220.GA11207@redhat.com> <87pmhofr1q.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87v8rfevz3.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87h72zes14.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <20220729204730.GA3625@redhat.com> <875yjfdw3a.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:46:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Tycho Andersen's message of "Mon, 15 Aug 2022 07:59:08 -0600") Message-ID: <87wn9z1i5b.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1oaIys-007k7X-Mh;;;mid=<87wn9z1i5b.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.110.29.46;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=softfail X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18PIokmn08vX/hBB3WTU24vRT4rnbzUX9U= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.110.29.46 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] fuse: In fuse_flush only wait if someone wants the return code X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tycho Andersen writes: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 12:10:33AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Al, vfs folks? (igrab/iput sorted so as not to be distractions). > > Any movement on this? Can you resend (or I can) the patch with the > fixes for fuse at the very least? Sorry for not replying earlier. Thank you for taking this. I had really meant to suggest something like that. At the moment I have a bit too much on my plate, so I am glad to see this moving forward. I am a bit sad that I didn't succeed in starting a general vfs discussion about this. Oh well. As long as we get weird bugs like this fixed. Eric