From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19526C433FE for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 23:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346446AbhKYXEd (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 18:04:33 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:55392 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346477AbhKYXCa (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 18:02:30 -0500 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1637881157; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ugt1G/SdWBE0wiro3gWnyQg72Gn0NEL2fJxJcz59nAQ=; b=EDuojfhYiSNzISCNz+VyzUGoLJ9FEpyD7l8aPYYMdg9P6YyGZHsPsLB9rMmw2bDOrHbMLL Aqb4S9P7+VSwvtFHqxQnXGLz5Byp/GkCFZMQrnSKrWHwKlI7mEZMj0YTKP+jyPunPugHd2 tyWlR1COg2N9Vo6ETi+MHLish+26UB6B+RizRXVepK9eLjRibZ0UDk6AaX4XVsdDCEnL84 uzlj3Gb+5s5O5ipdFeD1X00CCIl3vQPTlsqg7ksZlzNWSN3equvuZcO24iwbHdJEz5QvwO uzIkXalcYCgIrW+bcSxhD+9tqv8AcTF8XeeFvKh2kkOAhh3FSH1MO5hYK+viHA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1637881157; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ugt1G/SdWBE0wiro3gWnyQg72Gn0NEL2fJxJcz59nAQ=; b=HalzZrs3HOmU+qpVCTonO9kgEGhD1BiNmidP7QG1MKXUrFerKJAAJ5akBCOV0nl5h96ZeM 7hgEn1q2dvlo/EDA== To: Paolo Bonzini , isaku.yamahata@intel.com, Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , erdemaktas@google.com, Connor Kuehl , Sean Christopherson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: isaku.yamahata@gmail.com, Xiaoyao Li Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 54/59] KVM: X86: Introduce initial_tsc_khz in struct kvm_arch In-Reply-To: <741df444-5cd0-2049-f93a-c2521e4f426d@redhat.com> References: <5ba3573c8b82fcbdc3f3994f6d4d2a3c40445be9.1637799475.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com> <875ysghrp8.ffs@tglx> <741df444-5cd0-2049-f93a-c2521e4f426d@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 23:59:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87wnkvhmez.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paolo, On Thu, Nov 25 2021 at 23:13, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 11/25/21 22:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> You can argue that my request is unreasonable until you are blue in >> your face, it's not going to lift my NAK on this. > > There's no need for that. I'd be saying the same, and I don't think > it's particularly helpful that you made it almost a personal issue. To be entirely clear. It's a personal issue. Being on the receiving end of a firehose which spills liquid manure for more than 15 years is not a pleasant experience at all. Being accused to have unreasonable, unactionable and even bizarre review requests (mostly behind the scenes) is not helping either. I'm dead tired of sitting down for hours explaining basics in lengthy emails over and over just to get yet another experience of being ignored after a couple of months filled with silence. While I did not do that in this particular context, I read back on the previous incarnations of this crud and found out that you are in the exact same situation. So what's the difference? Nothing at all. It's about time that someone speaks up in unambiguous words to make it entirely clear that this is not acceptable at all in the kernel community as a whole and not just because a single person being unreasonable or whatever. Both of us wasted enough time already to explain how to do it right. There is no point anymore to proliferate any of these political correctness games further. Thanks, Thomas