From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3930C433F5 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A2D6124F for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235450AbhJEO0u (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:26:50 -0400 Received: from so254-9.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.9]:25277 "EHLO so254-9.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235312AbhJEO0p (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:26:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1633443895; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: References: Subject: Cc: To: From: Sender; bh=Ww0Ve07mMasz5L9jVhgn12WcbFLxKZLtDHJlPaIMDwA=; b=CtcJzFkkxz5m2vXSJJqP+Hrwp4Gny3lG3T3Mhx72q6iZSBUrquQR8Cn3h4m89XOo7EWSzXps QcoP++gwhnywO4KTXOrYxCK3dt+t98FxnZpJXWkP9k//pNdFX2cy4FGrDbejZp6RCZtIa0/e L8moXZ/xKar8be+/vmgd8y5C61Q= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.9 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n02.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 615c6022b8ab9916b3b451c2 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 14:24:34 GMT Sender: kvalo=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 43FC6C4361A; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tykki (tynnyri.adurom.net [51.15.11.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82DBDC4338F; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:24:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 82DBDC4338F Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=codeaurora.org From: Kalle Valo To: Linus =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=BCssing?= Cc: Felix Fietkau , ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , "John W . Linville" , Felix Fietkau , Simon Wunderlich , Sven Eckelmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ath9k: interrupt fixes on queue reset References: <20210914192515.9273-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 17:24:26 +0300 In-Reply-To: ("Linus \=\?utf-8\?Q\?L\=C3\=BCssing\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:12:20 +0200") Message-ID: <87wnmreehx.fsf@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus L=C3=BCssing writes: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 09:25:12PM +0200, Linus L=C3=BCssing wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> The following are two patches for ath9k to fix a potential interrupt >> storm (PATCH 2/3) and to fix potentially resetting the wifi chip while >> its interrupts were accidentally reenabled (PATCH 3/3). >>=20 >> PATCH 1/3 adds the possibility to trigger the ath9k queue reset through >> the ath9k reset file in debugfs. Which was helpful to reproduce and debug >> this issue and might help for future debugging. >>=20 >> PATCH 2/3 and PATCH 3/3 should be applicable for stable. >>=20 >> Regards, Linus >>=20 > > I've marked PATCH 3/3 as "rejected" in Patchwork now due to > Felix's legitimate remarks. BTW I prefer to mark patches as rejected myself in patchwork so that I know what's happening (patchwork is lacking in this respect as it doesn't notify me if there are any changes in patches). But good that you mentioned this via email so I didn't need to wonder what happened. > For patches 1/3 and and 2/3 I'd still like to see them merged upstream > if there is no objection to those. Thanks, I was about to ask what I should do with this patchset. --=20 https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatc= hes