From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Xin He <hexin.op@bytedance.com>,
keescook@chromium.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugobjects: add missing empty function debug_object_active_state()
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 18:47:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnqpdco2.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE-0n51T9ZGADCk6LaKJdnQwPvMCawSvjwUP+AF0hFohAFom0A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 18 2021 at 22:03, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Xin He (2021-06-17 00:10:27)
>> All other functions are defined for when CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS
>> is not set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin He <hexin.op@bytedance.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/debugobjects.h | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/debugobjects.h b/include/linux/debugobjects.h
>> index 8d2dde23e9fb..af0d73d8d29b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/debugobjects.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/debugobjects.h
>> @@ -99,6 +99,9 @@ static inline void
>> debug_object_free (void *addr, const struct debug_obj_descr *descr) { }
>> static inline void
>> debug_object_assert_init(void *addr, const struct debug_obj_descr *descr) { }
>> +static inline void
>> +debug_object_active_state(void *addr, const struct debug_obj_descr *descr,
>> + unsigned int expect, unsigned int next) { }
>
> I suppose it's a landmine that may go off at some point, but this isn't
> fixing anything that's broken at the moment, correct?
The two users (RCU/i915) have it guarded with RCU/I915 specific config
options which depend on CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS.
I have no problem with the patch per se, but it want's a proper use case.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-19 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-17 7:10 [PATCH] debugobjects: add missing empty function debug_object_active_state() Xin He
2021-06-19 5:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-06-19 16:47 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-06-20 5:52 ` [External] " 何鑫
2021-06-20 11:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-20 5:40 ` 何鑫
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wnqpdco2.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=hexin.op@bytedance.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).