From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01B6C433B4 for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 13:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD786140B for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 13:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229679AbhEIN4z (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2021 09:56:55 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:59748 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229602AbhEIN4z (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2021 09:56:55 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1620568551; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tbIKhz7cqq8kDkJ2MrpIE0ligoxtEOO42wHzqgYTaLI=; b=KlRFJW73GufhLkvR5a3cWFjrQewdHYUkYVglhGkMitJIJsTQa/n48yxg3kOgvb/+01cnIa qky63ujrbf1Bub7Ie2nqk9n77E6ahAlrXl9OYWp4MT6i8UvZ59IeZ2uUZKJ1gC+gwz+p7l ejMoV3sail6TwHlXPv6hS4dtIZH4AXG4hXAd3wbH+vYgTz2QgRls16X9R8p5zfnaelwNUu UxZuhFbc3CVVAvFqJZcGa6CijKBIGwLudVZDcZ4jyDkcrHaqWbl8jDtujD778EBiFd1xNO slQmZvXQi/m6Je2ewNbCTcV9kET3aAhtgeMYvdDY48/YvdwnGDziU31EREncAg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1620568551; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tbIKhz7cqq8kDkJ2MrpIE0ligoxtEOO42wHzqgYTaLI=; b=ACtbLBYDR03czoV0e4xtVfJvvsQrpMmCdgpwf7udzl33MrPp1JYgGY0E4NUYWcJKRlGkTC iK9s0xUFfOjRN/Dw== To: Lai Jiangshan , LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86/cpu: Init exception handling from cpu_init_secondary() In-Reply-To: References: <20210507110210.147106915@linutronix.de> <20210507114000.429303187@linutronix.de> Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 15:55:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87wns8ko48.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 09 2021 at 07:40, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > On 2021/5/7 19:02, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP >> +void cpu_init_secondary(void) >> +{ >> + cpu_init_exception_handling(); >> + cpu_init(); >> +} >> +#endif > > Hello > > No code invokes this function in this patch. > > Forgot to invoke it from start_secondary() or somewhere? Yes. Stupid me.