From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6880FC169C4 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 05:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1E92087F for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 05:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726974AbfAaFqZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:46:25 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:57395 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725809AbfAaFqZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:46:25 -0500 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43qq3f4Spmz9sDX; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:46:22 +1100 (AEDT) From: Michael Ellerman To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Joe Lawrence , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Balbir Singh , Josh Poimboeuf , Nicolai Stange , Torsten Duwe Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] powerpc/livepatch: reliable stack unwinder fixes In-Reply-To: References: <20190122155724.27557-1-joe.lawrence@redhat.com> <87y372pc75.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:46:22 +1100 Message-ID: <87womlnzv5.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jiri Kosina writes: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Michael Ellerman wrote: > >> I'm happy to take it, unless there's some reason you'd rather it go via >> the LP tree? > > As this is more about reliable stack unwinding than live patching per se > (which is only a user of that facility), I'd actually slightly prefer if > it goes via your tree. Sure thing, I'll take it. cheers