linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, m@bues.ch,
	mb@bu3sch.de, mpm@selenic.com, amit.shah@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] hw_random: fix stuck in catting hwrng attributes
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 12:13:08 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wq91odhf.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410796949-2221-3-git-send-email-akong@redhat.com>

Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com> writes:

> I started a QEMU (non-smp) guest with one virtio-rng device, and read
> random data from /dev/hwrng by dd:
>
>  # dd if=/dev/hwrng of=/dev/null &
>
> In the same time, if I check hwrng attributes from sysfs by cat:
>
>  # cat /sys/class/misc/hw_random/rng_*
>
> The cat process always gets stuck with slow backend (5 k/s), if we
> use a quick backend (1.2 M/s), the cat process will cost 1 to 2
> minutes. The stuck doesn't exist for smp guest.
>
> Reading syscall enters kernel and call rng_dev_read(), it's user
> context. We used need_resched() to check if other tasks need to
> be run, but it almost always return false, and re-hold the mutex
> lock. The attributes accessing process always fails to hold the
> lock, so the cat gets stuck.
>
> User context doesn't allow other user contexts run on that CPU,
> unless the kernel code sleeps for some reason. This is why the
> need_reshed() always return false here.
>
> This patch removed need_resched() and always schedule other tasks
> then other tasks can have chance to hold the lock and execute
> protected code.

OK, this is going to be a rant.

Your explanation doesn't make sense at all.  Worse, your solution breaks
the advice of Kernighan & Plaugher: "Don't patch bad code - rewrite
it.".

But worst of all, this detailed explanation might have convinced me you
understood the problem better than I did, and applied your patch.

I did some tests.  For me, as expected, the process spends its time
inside the virtio rng read function, holding the mutex and thus blocking
sysfs access; it's not a failure of this code at all.

Your schedule_timeout() "fix" probably just helps by letting the host
refresh entropy, so we spend less time waiting in the read fn.

I will post a series, which unfortunately is only lightly tested, then
I'm going to have some beer to begin my holiday.  That may help me
forget my disappointment at seeing respected fellow developers
monkey-patching random code they don't understand.

Grrr....
Rusty.

> Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> index c591d7e..263a370 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> @@ -195,8 +195,7 @@ static ssize_t rng_dev_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf,
>  
>  		mutex_unlock(&rng_mutex);
>  
> -		if (need_resched())
> -			schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
> +		schedule_timeout_interruptible(1);
>  
>  		if (signal_pending(current)) {
>  			err = -ERESTARTSYS;
> -- 
> 1.9.3


  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-18  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-15 16:02 [PATCH v2 0/3] fix stuck in accessing hwrng attributes Amos Kong
2014-09-15 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] virtio-rng cleanup: move some code out of mutex protection Amos Kong
2014-09-15 16:13   ` Michael Büsch
2014-09-16  0:30     ` Amos Kong
2014-09-15 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] hw_random: fix stuck in catting hwrng attributes Amos Kong
2014-09-18  2:43   ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2014-09-18  2:48     ` [PATCH 1/5] hw_random: place mutex around read functions and buffers Rusty Russell
2014-09-18  2:48       ` [PATCH 2/5] hw_random: use reference counts on each struct hwrng Rusty Russell
2014-09-18 12:22         ` Amos Kong
2014-09-18  2:48       ` [PATCH 3/5] hw_random: fix unregister race Rusty Russell
2014-10-21 14:15         ` Herbert Xu
2014-11-03 15:24           ` Amos Kong
2014-09-18  2:48       ` [PATCH 4/5] hw_random: don't double-check old_rng Rusty Russell
2014-09-18  2:48       ` [PATCH 5/5] hw_random: don't init list element we're about to add to list Rusty Russell
2014-09-18 12:47     ` [PATCH v2 2/3] hw_random: fix stuck in catting hwrng attributes Amos Kong
2014-09-15 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] hw_random: increase schedule timeout in rng_dev_read() Amos Kong
2014-09-15 16:13   ` Michael Büsch
2014-09-16  0:27     ` Amos Kong
2014-09-16 15:01       ` Michael Büsch
2014-09-17  9:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] fix stuck in accessing hwrng attributes Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wq91odhf.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=akong@redhat.com \
    --cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m@bues.ch \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).