From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/50] sched: Provide schedule point for RT locks
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 11:49:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2a9b4xw.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210714082820.GB2725@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Jul 14 2021 at 10:28, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:10:59PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -5832,8 +5832,14 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct tas
>> */
>> #define SM_NONE 0x0
>> #define SM_PREEMPT 0x1
>> -#define SM_MASK_PREEMPT UINT_MAX
>> -#define SM_MASK_STATE SM_MASK_PREEMPT
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
>> +# define SM_MASK_PREEMPT UINT_MAX
>> +# define SM_MASK_STATE SM_MASK_PREEMPT
>> +#else
>> +# define SM_RTLOCK_WAIT 0x2
>> +# define SM_MASK_PREEMPT SM_PREEMPT
>> +# define SM_MASK_STATE (SM_PREEMPT | SM_RTLOCK_WAIT)
>> +#endif
>
> Wouldn't something like this:
>
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> # define SM_MASK_PREEMPT (~0U)
> #else
> # define SM_RTLOCK_WAIT 0x2
> # define SM_MASK_PREEMPT SM_PREEMPT
> #endif
>
> #define SM_MASK_STATE (~0U)
>
> Be even better?
SM_MASK_STATE is overengineered. See combo patch 4+5 below
Thanks,
tglx
---
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5822,6 +5822,24 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct tas
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */
/*
+ * Constants for the sched_mode argument of __schedule().
+ *
+ * The mode argument allows RT enabled kernels to differentiate a
+ * preemption from blocking on an 'sleeping' spin/rwlock. Note, that
+ * SM_MASK_PREEMPT for !RT is UINT_MAX which allows the compiler to
+ * optimize the AND operation out and just check for zero.
+ */
+#define SM_NONE 0x0
+#define SM_PREEMPT 0x1
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+# define SM_MASK_PREEMPT UINT_MAX
+#else
+# define SM_RTLOCK_WAIT 0x2
+# define SM_MASK_PREEMPT SM_PREEMPT
+#endif
+
+/*
* __schedule() is the main scheduler function.
*
* The main means of driving the scheduler and thus entering this function are:
@@ -5860,7 +5878,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct tas
*
* WARNING: must be called with preemption disabled!
*/
-static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
+static void __sched notrace __schedule(unsigned int sched_mode)
{
struct task_struct *prev, *next;
unsigned long *switch_count;
@@ -5873,13 +5891,13 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(b
rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
prev = rq->curr;
- schedule_debug(prev, preempt);
+ schedule_debug(prev, !!sched_mode);
if (sched_feat(HRTICK) || sched_feat(HRTICK_DL))
hrtick_clear(rq);
local_irq_disable();
- rcu_note_context_switch(preempt);
+ rcu_note_context_switch(!!sched_mode);
/*
* Make sure that signal_pending_state()->signal_pending() below
@@ -5913,7 +5931,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(b
* - ptrace_{,un}freeze_traced() can change ->state underneath us.
*/
prev_state = READ_ONCE(prev->__state);
- if (!preempt && prev_state) {
+ if (!(sched_mode & SM_MASK_PREEMPT) && prev_state) {
if (signal_pending_state(prev_state, prev)) {
WRITE_ONCE(prev->__state, TASK_RUNNING);
} else {
@@ -5979,7 +5997,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(b
migrate_disable_switch(rq, prev);
psi_sched_switch(prev, next, !task_on_rq_queued(prev));
- trace_sched_switch(preempt, prev, next);
+ trace_sched_switch(sched_mode & SM_MASK_PREEMPT, prev, next);
/* Also unlocks the rq: */
rq = context_switch(rq, prev, next, &rf);
@@ -6000,7 +6018,7 @@ void __noreturn do_task_dead(void)
/* Tell freezer to ignore us: */
current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
- __schedule(false);
+ __schedule(SM_NONE);
BUG();
/* Avoid "noreturn function does return" - but don't continue if BUG() is a NOP: */
@@ -6061,7 +6079,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __sched schedu
sched_submit_work(tsk);
do {
preempt_disable();
- __schedule(false);
+ __schedule(SM_NONE);
sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
} while (need_resched());
sched_update_worker(tsk);
@@ -6089,7 +6107,7 @@ void __sched schedule_idle(void)
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(current->__state);
do {
- __schedule(false);
+ __schedule(SM_NONE);
} while (need_resched());
}
@@ -6124,6 +6142,18 @@ void __sched schedule_preempt_disabled(v
preempt_disable();
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+void __sched notrace schedule_rtlock(void)
+{
+ do {
+ preempt_disable();
+ __schedule(SM_RTLOCK_WAIT);
+ sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
+ } while (need_resched());
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(schedule_rtlock);
+#endif
+
static void __sched notrace preempt_schedule_common(void)
{
do {
@@ -6142,7 +6172,7 @@ static void __sched notrace preempt_sche
*/
preempt_disable_notrace();
preempt_latency_start(1);
- __schedule(true);
+ __schedule(SM_PREEMPT);
preempt_latency_stop(1);
preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace();
@@ -6221,7 +6251,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __sched notrac
* an infinite recursion.
*/
prev_ctx = exception_enter();
- __schedule(true);
+ __schedule(SM_PREEMPT);
exception_exit(prev_ctx);
preempt_latency_stop(1);
@@ -6370,7 +6400,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __sched preemp
do {
preempt_disable();
local_irq_enable();
- __schedule(true);
+ __schedule(SM_PREEMPT);
local_irq_disable();
sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
} while (need_resched());
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ extern long schedule_timeout_idle(long t
asmlinkage void schedule(void);
extern void schedule_preempt_disabled(void);
asmlinkage void preempt_schedule_irq(void);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+ extern void schedule_rtlock(void);
+#endif
extern int __must_check io_schedule_prepare(void);
extern void io_schedule_finish(int token);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-14 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-13 15:10 [patch 00/50] locking, sched: The PREEMPT-RT locking infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:10 ` [patch 01/50] sched: Split out the wakeup state check Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:10 ` [patch 02/50] sched: Introduce TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:10 ` [patch 03/50] sched: Prepare for RT sleeping spin/rwlocks Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 19:52 ` Waiman Long
2021-07-14 23:20 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-07-15 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-15 14:08 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-07-13 15:10 ` [patch 04/50] sched: Rework the __schedule() preempt argument Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 20:04 ` Waiman Long
2021-07-13 15:10 ` [patch 05/50] sched: Provide schedule point for RT locks Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-14 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-14 9:49 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-07-14 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-14 11:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 06/50] sched/wake_q: Provide WAKE_Q_HEAD_INITIALIZER Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 07/50] rtmutex: Convert macros to inlines Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 08/50] rtmutex: Switch to try_cmpxchg() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 09/50] rtmutex: Split API and implementation Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 10/50] locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_mutex_slowlock_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-27 17:20 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-07-27 19:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 11/50] locking/rtmutex: Provide lockdep less variants of rtmutex interfaces Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 12/50] locking: Add base code for RT rw_semaphore and rwlock Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 13/50] locking/rwsem: Add rtmutex based R/W semaphore implementation Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 14/50] locking/rtmutex: Add wake_state to rt_mutex_waiter Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-14 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-14 11:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 15/50] locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_mutex_wake_q and helpers Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 16/50] locking/rtmutex: Use rt_mutex_wake_q_head Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-14 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-14 9:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 17/50] locking/rtmutex: Prepare RT rt_mutex_wake_q for RT locks Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-14 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-14 9:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 18/50] locking/rtmutex: Guard regular sleeping locks specific functions Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 19/50] locking/spinlock: Split the lock types header Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 20/50] locking/rtmutex: Prevent future include recursion hell Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 21/50] locking/lockdep: Reduce includes in debug_locks.h Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 22/50] rbtree: Split out the rbtree type definitions Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-14 9:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-14 9:31 ` Arnaldo
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 23/50] locking/rtmutex: Include only rbtree types Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 24/50] locking/spinlock: Provide RT specific spinlock type Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-14 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-14 10:07 ` [PATCH] media/atomisp: Use lockdep instead of *mutex_is_locked() Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 25/50] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant header Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 26/50] locking/rtmutex: Provide the spin/rwlock core lock function Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-14 10:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 27/50] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-14 11:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 28/50] locking/rwlock: " Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 29/50] locking/mutex: Consolidate core headers Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 30/50] locking/mutex: Move waiter to core header Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 31/50] locking/ww_mutex: Move ww_mutex declarations into ww_mutex.h Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 32/50] locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock raw Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 33/50] locking/mutex: Introduce _mutex_t Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-15 17:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 34/50] locking/mutex: Rename the ww_mutex relevant functions Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 35/50] locking/ww_mutex: Switch to _mutex_t Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 36/50] locking/mutex: Replace struct mutex in core code Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 37/50] locking/mutex: Rearrange items in mutex.h Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 38/50] locking/mutex: Exclude non-ww_mutex API for RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 39/50] locking/rtmutex: Add mutex variant " Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 40/50] lib/test_lockup: Adapt to changed variables Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 41/50] futex: Validate waiter correctly in futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 42/50] futex: Cleanup stale comments Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-28 23:28 ` André Almeida
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 43/50] futex: Correct the number of requeued waiters for PI Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 44/50] futex: Restructure futex_requeue() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 45/50] futex: Clarify comment in futex_requeue() Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 46/50] futex: Prevent requeue_pi() lock nesting issue on RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 47/50] rtmutex: Prevent lockdep false positive with PI futexes Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 48/50] preempt: Adjust PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET for RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 49/50] locking/rtmutex: Implement equal priority lock stealing Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-13 15:11 ` [patch 50/50] locking/rtmutex: Add adaptive spinwait mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-27 17:19 ` [patch 00/50] locking, sched: The PREEMPT-RT locking infrastructure Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y2a9b4xw.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).