From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801AEC433B4 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 12:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5771B6141F for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 12:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232977AbhENMMj (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 08:12:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49628 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231394AbhENMM3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 08:12:29 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F4B0C061574; Fri, 14 May 2021 05:11:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1620994274; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JIAwkD/jRzI9tC6KpHVIn53v9oWTFSTWOyb/GzU2URA=; b=vs3d2hBAHPz+s3SkCdp49kBQ9AJlmMPPY1BjwONhFLr8Za0eeVPpTAcYiaiy+jk4dUBcMo D/ecmSSPHeuZjJrJ5xccG8frzfi8YYHKj5TjR/dDMzzrekSgHvlR4ICNarQwgIXTUHmk56 XDVZGnQu20WJK6drvJgfCXZ+O1HGWJi4wts1qlfVhMZlTf+GWXsWrIDqi7UbXM2IYBwgnY XT5BGhPArFXuOPSEtAcrujJg+oz6VRgrSz2sUb97W2fQrBDYiBckzdY00GhvpWFp67d2cW Y2P7sMUfPAOPlozP1TCbdCxXGf3kdMPYj8nX/79MfHet6DGI+rbhzeq7f/7c0Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1620994274; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JIAwkD/jRzI9tC6KpHVIn53v9oWTFSTWOyb/GzU2URA=; b=RWhoIMBAOhBd6Kk2dUlpsilPoVPt/uR15qt+FmID1P2YWS4msPRP0Qb40Kxif0Xk+L0qQk 4cpbjXQXohYNq/AQ== To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli , linux-rt-users , LKML , sassmann@redhat.com, "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , stable-rt@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Treat __napi_schedule_irqoff() as __napi_schedule() on PREEMPT_RT In-Reply-To: <20210513124310.1d8b33f0@gandalf.local.home> References: <20210512214324.hiaiw3e2tzmsygcz@linutronix.de> <87k0o360zx.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20210512205046.7eabe8fc@oasis.local.home> <20210513124310.1d8b33f0@gandalf.local.home> Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:11:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgwx4ise.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 13 2021 at 12:43, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 12 May 2021 20:50:46 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> On Thu, 13 May 2021 00:28:02 +0200 >> Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> > No matter which variant we end up with, this needs to go into all stable >> > RT kernels ASAP. >> >> Is this in rt-devel already? >> >> I'll start pulling in whatever is in there. > > I don't see this in the rt-devel tree. The stable-rt releases always pull > from there (following the stable vs mainline relationship). > > Is there going to be a new rt-devel release? Once we have time to work on it. The patch got applied to net-next, so please pick it up from there. Thanks, tglx